How come some 500s rating players are tougher than 7-800s rating players

Sort:
WilliamSunday_1990

Hey

WilliamSunday_1990
Gottfried94 wrote:
WilliamSunday_1990 wrote:

I am a 1120 rated player in Rapid chess. And 550 in blitz. I'm definitely not the most advanced player, however, I got about over 2200 games of experience on Chess.com. The interesting thing that I've experienced is, for some reason, A 500 blitz opponent to me is just as tough as a 1200 rapid opponent. I find Blitz chess to be a way more challenging league/ball-game than Rapid Chess. No offence to Rapid Chess, but after playing many games at Rapid and Blitz, to me, these two are way different types of ball games. Rapid Chess vs Blitz Chess is kind of like Boxing vs MMA. Sure both games have their unique set of specialities, but at the end of the day, Blitz are just a way more tougher environment to excel. And if you can reach a 1200 rating in Blitz Chess, then you can beat a 2200 rated Rapid player. If you don't believe me, check out this link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZhdAPhq7eM the 1st 6 minutes of this video where Gotham Chess were outplayed by a 1000 rated player at Blitz Chess. In my opinion, if you reach a 1000 rating in blitz Chess, then you've earned a lot of respect.

Bro seriously. Watch your video again so you don't embarrass yourself

Dude, why do you say that?

I mean, I understand where you're coming from. In the other games after the first one against, he was in control, pointing out their mistakes, helping them out, and all that. But let's focus on that first game. Those initial 6 minutes where Gotham Chess was surprised by how well his opponent was playing, and they both got into a real battle.

My point is, for those who aren't familiar with Blitz chess, a 1000 rating in Blitz isn't the same as a 1000 rating in Rapid. People who think hitting 1000 in Rapid means you'll easily hit it in Blitz too are mistaken. It's way tougher to beat a 1000-rated Blitz player than a 1000-rated Rapid player—ask anyone. Almost 90% of my opponents have a Rapid rating at least 400 points higher than their Blitz rating, even with tons of games played in both.

Let's give credit where it's due. A 1000-rated Blitz player can occasionally beat a 2200 player, as seen in that video. So, yeah, that's all I'm saying—acknowledge the skill where it shows man.

 
 
 
You
 
Gottfried94
WilliamSunday_1990 wrote:

Dude, why do you say that?

I mean, I understand where you're coming from. In the other games after the first one against, he was in control, pointing out their mistakes, helping them out, and all that. But let's focus on that first game. Those initial 6 minutes where Gotham Chess was surprised by how well his opponent was playing, and they both got into a real battle.

My point is, for those who aren't familiar with Blitz chess, a 1000 rating in Blitz isn't the same as a 1000 rating in Rapid. People who think hitting 1000 in Rapid means you'll easily hit it in Blitz too are mistaken. It's way tougher to beat a 1000-rated Blitz player than a 1000-rated Rapid player—ask anyone. Almost 90% of my opponents have a Rapid rating at least 400 points higher than their Blitz rating, even with tons of games played in both.

Let's give credit where it's due. A 1000-rated Blitz player can occasionally beat a 2200 player, as seen in that video. So, yeah, that's all I'm saying—acknowledge the skill where it shows man.

 
 
 
You
 

Bro you should calm down and watch the video again. Gotham didn't play seriously at all, not only he did not capture his opponent's free hanging pieces he also invited him to his king to see, if he can spot the mate. If you frankly believe that it was legit match and Gotham got crushed by a 1000 then you must be out of your mind. Btw Gotham is 2700 on chess.com in blitz.
Just for you I can share my personal experience, I play chess with my friend at work almost every break, he's 1100 blitz me 1550 and out of like higher dozens of games we played so far he did not beat me a single time. Once he was close, I blundered my queen (for a rook), but I managed to win the game anyway.
This 1000 guy against 2700 Gotham is absolutely without a chance. 0,000000 % chance.
And about differences in bullet/blitz/rapid that's completely different topic

BigChessplayer665
Gottfried94 wrote:
WilliamSunday_1990 wrote:

Dude, why do you say that?

I mean, I understand where you're coming from. In the other games after the first one against, he was in control, pointing out their mistakes, helping them out, and all that. But let's focus on that first game. Those initial 6 minutes where Gotham Chess was surprised by how well his opponent was playing, and they both got into a real battle.

My point is, for those who aren't familiar with Blitz chess, a 1000 rating in Blitz isn't the same as a 1000 rating in Rapid. People who think hitting 1000 in Rapid means you'll easily hit it in Blitz too are mistaken. It's way tougher to beat a 1000-rated Blitz player than a 1000-rated Rapid player—ask anyone. Almost 90% of my opponents have a Rapid rating at least 400 points higher than their Blitz rating, even with tons of games played in both.

Let's give credit where it's due. A 1000-rated Blitz player can occasionally beat a 2200 player, as seen in that video. So, yeah, that's all I'm saying—acknowledge the skill where it shows man.

 
 
 
You
 

Bro you should calm down and watch the video again. Gotham didn't play seriously at all, not only he did not capture his opponent's free hanging pieces he also invited him to his king to see, if he can spot the mate. If you frankly believe that it was legit match and Gotham got crushed by a 1000 then you must be out of your mind. Btw Gotham is 2700 on chess.com in blitz.
Just for you I can share my personal experience, I play chess with my friend at work almost every break, he's 1100 blitz me 1550 and out of like higher dozens of games we played so far he did not beat me a single time. Once he was close, I blundered my queen (for a rook), but I managed to win the game anyway.
This 1000 guy against 2700 Gotham is absolutely without a chance. 0,000000 % chance.
And about differences in bullet/blitz/rapid that's completely different topic

Chessbrahs lost to a 100 legitimately

They got distracted and hung mate in one so it isn't exactly zero chance

Justanotherfolkh

Maybe they are cheating...

BigChessplayer665
Justanotherfolkh wrote:

Maybe they are cheating...

Nah chessbrahs just hung mate in one

I'm pretty sure they were a staff member but not 100% sure

Justanotherfolkh

Thats chessbrahs problem...

BigChessplayer665
Justanotherfolkh wrote:

Thats chessbrahs problem...

Yup lol doesnt matter how good they are if you blunder mate in one and your opponent actually sees it

Justanotherfolkh

Yeah....

PJSKVocaloid_39
It’s because some of them focus on the RATING, not the position
ChessMasteryOfficial

You might approach games against lower-rated players with less focus or seriousness, leading to unexpected losses.