How Good Is Gothamchess??

Sort:
Avatar of ChampoftheBepoCamp

TBF @Pfren said he doesn't play so...

Avatar of llama47
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

Avatar of assassin3752
TheMandal0ri4n wrote:
SpeedyScorpionBull wrote:

I think he is op

I think people who blunder are better to learn from. Gothamchess never loses a game, I think.

I think you don't know what you're talking about.

Avatar of rychessmaster1
llama47 wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
llama47 wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
darkbrah7654 wrote:
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:

I don’t hate naka for his online shenanigans more I hate him for how far ahead he is from everyone else on chess.com

Comrade hikaru is Champ level

depends on who you're comparing him to

? Hikaru is the crop of the cream

He's lost to Carlsen multiple times in the Chess.com speed chess championship.

He's lost to Carlsen his entire career (he only won a single game).

Hikaru is not Classical!

Didn't Magnus burn out of the SCC last time around...

Carlsen hasn't won 100% of the SCC events, that's true.

From memory though he's won two of them (ahead of Naka).

MVL beat him in the last one

Avatar of keep1teasy
TheMandal0ri4n wrote:
SpeedyScorpionBull wrote:

I think he is op

I think people who blunder are better to learn from. Gothamchess never loses a game, I think.

If I was a content creator I too would limit the number of times I lose to my viewers. 

That being said he still pokes a lot of fun at himself.

Avatar of keep1teasy
rychessmaster1 wrote:

^ is trash

Avatar of rychessmaster1
B1ZMARK wrote:
GothamChess wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

That's not very nice!

you should have said "ok"

should have said ok boomer tongue.png

Avatar of rychessmaster1

just realized you could have deleted your comment

Dodged a bullet there

Avatar of keep1teasy

What

Avatar of sleazymate
I enjoy Levy’s latest series of videos where he plays against anonymous titled players and explains his thinking process. Seems like quality to me
Avatar of ChampoftheBepoCamp

Ah November is coming... Magnus are you ready?

Time is going tik tok tik tok... Ian is coming for you happy.png Rooting for the status quo though

Avatar of THECHESSMAN_78
llama47 wrote:
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

his listed fide is 2200

Avatar of ChampoftheBepoCamp

I am too busy to watch gotham chess

Avatar of THECHESSMAN_78
ChampoftheCommieCamp wrote:

I am too busy to watch gotham chess

imagine being an adult lol 

Avatar of llama47
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

his listed fide is 2200

And...?

Avatar of THECHESSMAN_78
llama47 wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

his listed fide is 2200

And...?

gotham is like 2300 by rating he is better 

Avatar of ChampoftheBepoCamp

Apparently Levy is pushing for GM but haven't really watched lately

Avatar of llama47
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

his listed fide is 2200

And...?

gotham is like 2300 by rating he is better 

This has nothing to do with the posts you quoted.

Avatar of THECHESSMAN_78
llama47 wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
llama47 wrote:
-BEES- wrote:
THECHESSMAN_78 wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

no Gotham is about 2400 while your listed fide is 2200, and his online rating is better too, you seem like a butthurt elitist  

That does appear to be what it is.

I'm not a fan of Gotham's pesentation style. It is overly hyper and feels targeted towards young kids. That said, watching a 1700 blitz player claiming to be stronger at his peak is some next level arrogance. It would not surprise me if Levy has students that are stronger than Pfren.

Old age makes you worse, but come on, think of it... 1700 to 2400 is a huge gap. I don't think Pfren will be that bad even on his deathbed...

Online ratings can be inaccurate for any number of reasons, but the IM title is for real.

his listed fide is 2200

And...?

gotham is like 2300 by rating he is better 

This has nothing to do with the posts you quoted.

must of tagged the wrong  thing 

Avatar of ThatGuyNamedJeff
pfren wrote:
GothamChess wrote:
pfren wrote:

Good at what?

At playing he is almost good- so far his highest rating is about the same as mine many years ago.

As a chess streamer and YT influencer, he is total junk, which explains why he has so many followers.

That's not very nice!

 

As a young and promising player you should seriously reconsider the quality of your streams and videos. They might be entertaining for some, but surely enough they are not educative, partly because you are talking very fast and the watcher loses whatever has to be learnt from them, and partly because a lot of them turn around typical Hope Chess openings which will work once in a blue moon at normal time controls, and regularly more often at blitz.

I am sure that, given your chess knowledge, you can do VASTLY better than being just an entertainer. And it does not take much of an effort to achieve that.

I'm gonna have to disagree with you. Watching Gotham's videos helped me go from 812 to over 1000. Maybe it isn't very educating to people over 2000, but his channel is aimed more beginners. I also have a very short attention span, yet I can manage to watch Gotham's videos all the way through. In my opinion he shouldn't change anything, which I don't think he will because he has 1 million subscribers and is probably earning a fair bit of money from his channel, so why change?