Ah yes,a 2000+ in bullet plays this move in blitz,impressive.
How is this player not on the 5 Min Puzzle Rush World Leaderboard?
You have a program read data from the site, and then send data to the site.
So you get the board state, have an engine find the "best" move, then have the program play that move.
Interesting.
All they have to do is to click the start button and take a break, let the computer auto move for them.
Wow. What is even the point of cheating lol? YOU’RE NOT EVEN MOVING THE PIECES
I dunno, to feel good?They feel like they won because of their "hardwork".
tbh it is kinda hard work if they coded the program but I DON'T ENCOURAGE CHEATING PLEASE DONT
You have a program read data from the site, and then send data to the site.
So you get the board state, have an engine find the "best" move, then have the program play that move.
Interesting.
All they have to do is to click the start button and take a break, let the computer auto move for them.
Wow. What is even the point of cheating lol? YOU’RE NOT EVEN MOVING THE PIECES
I dunno, to feel good?They feel like they won because of their "hardwork".
tbh it is kinda hard work if they coded the program but I DON'T ENCOURAGE CHEATING PLEASE DONT
They don't have to code the program,they can download it online...
Ah yes,a 2000+ in bullet plays this move in blitz,impressive.
Maybe they are a god at flagging.
You have a program read data from the site, and then send data to the site.
So you get the board state, have an engine find the "best" move, then have the program play that move.
Interesting.
All they have to do is to click the start button and take a break, let the computer auto move for them.
Wow. What is even the point of cheating lol? YOU’RE NOT EVEN MOVING THE PIECES
What's the point of cheating if you're not going to do it well?
Cheaters who manually move the pieces are the laziest, and the most annoying to lose to.
(But from a cheat detection perspective, ofc they're the kind you want, since they're so easy to catch)
You have a program read data from the site, and then send data to the site.
So you get the board state, have an engine find the "best" move, then have the program play that move.
Interesting.
All they have to do is to click the start button and take a break, let the computer auto move for them.
Wow. What is even the point of cheating lol? YOU’RE NOT EVEN MOVING THE PIECES
What's the point of cheating if you're not going to do it well?
Cheaters who manually move the pieces are the laziest, and the most annoying to lose to.
(But from a cheat detection perspective, ofc they're the kind you want, since they're so easy to catch)
"When you are going to do anything, do it well"
They are not doing it well by taking 10 seconds to make a forced move
When an account does not have a chess title (CM, FM, IM etc.) and it achieves 50 or more puzzles, the result will not be published in the leaderboards. The account has to apply to publish it. I had to do so once.
When an account does not have a chess title (CM, FM, IM etc.) and it achieves 50 or more puzzles, the result will not be published in the leaderboards. The account has to apply to publish it. I had to do so once.
Thanks, Lee!
You have a program read data from the site, and then send data to the site.
So you get the board state, have an engine find the "best" move, then have the program play that move.
What program???
A computer program... what are you talking about?
Some people can write computer programs.
Some of those people also share those programs.
Most of them are very simple and get people banned quickly.
When an account does not have a chess title (CM, FM, IM etc.) and it achieves 50 or more puzzles, the result will not be published in the leaderboards. The account has to apply to publish it. I had to do so once.
Ohhhh that makes sense
bruh why did my letters starting being big in da end
In the middle of typing your post you copy and pasted something. This caused what you typed afterwards to take on the same font/size of the copy and pasted text. I'm guessing the link is what did it.
well it’s coz cc take it as cheating and they don’t put it on da leaderboard, the same hapenned to Casper Schoopen, he got like 60/70 without being on da leaderboard. https://www.chess.com/member/casper_schoppen
A IM cheated???
Reread
well it’s coz cc take it as cheating and they don’t put it on da leaderboard, the same hapenned to Casper Schoopen, he got like 60/70 without being on da leaderboard. https://www.chess.com/member/casper_schoppen
A IM cheated???
Actually, he's a GM.
@gobemo apparently has 104 in 5 minute puzzle rush. But I don't see him/her on the world leaderboard?
He is a cheater
well it’s coz cc take it as cheating and they don’t put it on da leaderboard, the same hapenned to Casper Schoopen, he got like 60/70 without being on da leaderboard. https://www.chess.com/member/casper_schoppen
A IM cheated???
Actually, he's a GM.
then y is he not closed???
Closed for what?
well it’s coz cc take it as cheating and they don’t put it on da leaderboard, the same hapenned to Casper Schoopen, he got like 60/70 without being on da leaderboard. https://www.chess.com/member/casper_schoppen
A IM cheated???
Actually, he's a GM.
then y is he not closed???
REREAD