I'm friends with a guy who just turned 60, and one of his main goals is to become a chessmaster. He's rated in the mid 2000s now, and despite studying every day, he makes little progress (Last time he broke 2100 was in 1997). He has good tournaments, and bad tournaments, and his rating has fluctuated between 2000 and 2080, more or less, for the last 15 years. I know of many adult players in their 20s and 30s making the jump from 2000 to 2200, but not of players over 60. Do you think he is just studying incorrectly, or does his age hinder his progress? Does he have a shot of making master?
You didn't really give much of a description of what he is studying, how long he studies, whether or not he takes lessons, etc.
60 year olds are doing a lot of things today that would have been unthinkable 50 years ago. Why shouldn't they be able to do things like make master? He's not starting from scratch.
What difference does it make if few people have done it so far?
I'm friends with a guy who just turned 60, and one of his main goals is to become a chessmaster. He's rated in the mid 2000s now, and despite studying every day, he makes little progress (Last time he broke 2100 was in 1997). He has good tournaments, and bad tournaments, and his rating has fluctuated between 2000 and 2080, more or less, for the last 15 years. I know of many adult players in their 20s and 30s making the jump from 2000 to 2200, but not of players over 60. Do you think he is just studying incorrectly, or does his age hinder his progress? Does he have a shot of making master?