How much points below ur peak is considered sandbagging

sandbagging is losing games on purpose. say you lose 3 and its obvious that its on purpose. that's sandbagging. so it losing 500 games. there's no definite line, and sandbagging is not to be confused with tilting.

ok sandbagging is DEFENITELY creating a chess.com account , making your rating 2000 and 10 minz later, ur rating is 500 lol

sandbagging is losing games on purpose. say you lose 3 and its obvious that its on purpose. that's sandbagging. so it losing 500 games. there's no definite line, and sandbagging is not to be confused with tilting.

ik tilt
tilt is unintentially losing rating
but sandbagging is intentially losing rating
I would say any intentional loss of rating for the purpose of competitive or financial advantage is sandbagging.

ik tilt
tilt is unintentially losing rating
but sandbagging is intentially losing rating
I would say any intentional loss of rating for the purpose of competitive or financial advantage is sandbagging.
Agreed.

i wouldn't say trolling weak players, usually they lower their rating and beat higher players to make them lose rating

sandbagging is losing games on purpose. say you lose 3 and its obvious that its on purpose. that's sandbagging. so it losing 500 games. there's no definite line, and sandbagging is not to be confused with tilting.
I lost 10 games in a row.
Am I a sandbagger now?
did you lose them intentionally to reduce your rating?

sandbagging is losing games on purpose. say you lose 3 and its obvious that its on purpose. that's sandbagging. so it losing 500 games. there's no definite line, and sandbagging is not to be confused with tilting.
I lost 10 games in a row.
Am I a sandbagger now?
did you lose them intentionally to reduce your rating?
Why would I do that?
so u r not a sandbagger
This forum is NOT to ask what sandbagging is.
It is to ask how much rating points below ur peak is considered sandbagging (assuming ur glicko rd is a low number)