Blitz games aren't worthwhile to analyze deeply because the time is so low you often play blunders knowing they aren't the best move.
So I think it's good to pick out either the largest mistake(s) or a type of mistake (like not knowing the opening or not knowing a certain attack / opening the center / minor piece trade etc was bad).
In this game you were losing because of tactical mistakes, so there is not much to learn (unless you make those types of mistakes very often).
So after 5...Qxe4 you can think to yourself, what is black's threat, and what kinds of moves defend it? There are two threats, on the rook and knight, so a potential lesson is you sometimes overlook threats on diagonals.
After 15...f4 you can take his queen. So a lesson there could be you don't look for your own threats before responding to your opponent's threats.
But as I said, this is a speed game, so those "lessons" and "analysis" might not help you at all. Usually when people talk about analyzing a game they mean tournament games (or games with long time controls).
Hi,
Recently in a blitz, I drew a lost game against a lesser rated opponent. How to analyse these type of games.
I know there were blunders, mistakes and opening types. which i kind of faced only now.
So initial analysis is it was a opening failure. should i look at it in a different way.
Regards,
Srinivas