14601 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@Manavendra, buy some good chess books and get to work. Simple.
Stop wasting your time playing. Your need more study time. Your priorities are WAY OUT OF BALANCE.
Getting stronger is largely a process of knowledge acquisition.
So get with the program, or your playing strength will remain in the cellar. Practice speeds should be Game in 10/5 up to Game in 60/5, whatever you are comfortable with.
You're too weak to play ONLINE chess. That kind of "practice" is much too slow to improve your game, "rapidly."
So if that's what you seek, you're effectively going about it "bass-ackwards."
To be honest, Rasparovov, I don't play Blitz myself, mostly because I don't like it, I find it very stressful. It's like protein shakes and the gym, I never drank them because I don't like them. In this situations, you can always find a substitute, such as egg whites in the case of weight-lifting.
Yeah eat lots of walnuts and do 3 sets of 20 tactics three days a week to start with, with resting days in between. For example monday you do endgame tactics, then recover a day, wednesday middlegame and saturday openings. Then the next week do 3 sets of 25 etc Another method if you're short on time is instead of 3 sets do one set of tactics to exhaustion. This can actually be more effective.
I very much agree with posts #30 and #42 but still, with practice and analysis alone, lots of players stick at plateaus before ever reaching 1800 ratings.
I think that one of the most important ways to improve is to get better at calculation. A basic skill that can get you very far. When you start seeing the board as a whole and figuring out what all the possible next moves could be, you get better and better.
Most 2000+ players I've spoken to say that usually when they win a game, it's because they calculated one move further than their opponent. Also, calculation training will get you way better at tactics.
Add to that a basic positional understanding with for example the videos in this site, and you can certainly expect improvement.
It took me 6 months to get from 1200 to 1600, so i think it is possible if you put the effort in. as you go up it only gets tougher, each bit of rating becomes harder to earn. just play a lot and study your lost games.
Rasparovov, Blitz helps you improve your concentration and reflexes when you are in time trouble. Imagine you are at a tournament playing a 2-hour-game and both you and your opponent have 2 minutes on the clock. At this point whoever is more relaxed and doesn’t panic has the edge. In this case, the occasional Blitz player will not panic and will win the match, as opposed to the other one that has not practised it. However, Blitz games should never become a substitute to your study, but a complement to it.
However blitz takes time away from long analysis which will give you the knowledge of what to do so you can quickly take these decisions. I do not think blitz is something you want to use your time for if you're gonna improve fast.Keeping your head calm in stressed situations can be practiced in other ways, and how many times do you end up in such big time trouble that you're blitzing moves by seconds? There's usually an increment anyways.
Long games on the internet are pretty boring anyways.Blitz is not harmful but is useful.I recently read an article by Dretch(GM Conrad Holt)on chess.com where he says that saying that blitz is not useful or is bad is nonsensical.Even my IM coach told me that Blitz is ok.Even though i agree that Analysis and Blitz shud be balanced.
Why would they be boring? It's the same game, just put a board beside your computer if you want it to feel more real. Blitz is harmful in the way it consumes time without giving equal amounts back in skill. It may not be bad to play blitz, you won't be a worse chess player. But I'm confident to say it's better to spend your time on other things if you want to improve asap.
You've got 30-odd games on the go, manavendra. I've also done some graphs of my ratings and found that they are inversely proportional to the number of concurrent games. The graphs showed an extremely close relationship between concurrent games and blunders and inversely to wins. My rating hasn't improved at all with my nearly 1000 games, but it does fluctuate a lot. I do no studying but some tactics training. I guess studying is important but I'd definitely recommend keeping on-line games under 20 or so and taking more time per move.
Sorry if this thread is old but I'd really like to know how it went for the topic creator. Did you improve? If so, by doing what?
"Zurich Chess Highlights with GM Alex Yermolinsky and GM Shabba"
2/13/2016 - Filipp S. Bondarenko, Feenschach 1960
by dufferps a few minutes ago
by jengaias 4 minutes ago
too much lag.
by notmtwain 17 minutes ago
Funny opening 3.Qxf7+
by HappyChessBear 19 minutes ago
by RookTheElevator 20 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 28 minutes ago
What's wrong with people on chess.com?
by HessianWarrior 29 minutes ago
Very interesting game
by Pistol_Pete_2 29 minutes ago
Post your Travel Chess Sets
by n9531l 31 minutes ago
Is this what Chess has become? Blitz vs. Classical
by Mcfmover 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!