Learn Chess Tactics by John Nunn
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233820/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review422.pdf
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Learn_Chess_Tactics.pdf
The Mammoth Book of the World’s Greatest Chess Games (New Edition) by Burgess, Nunn & Emms
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233403/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review782.pdf
Chess Endings: Essential Knowledge (CD) by Yuri Averbakh
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708101138/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review373.pdf
... You will learn enough about how to play the opening from studying games. ...
Books like First Steps: 1 e4 e5 and First Steps: Queen's Gambit
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7790.pdf
https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/7652.pdf
are sources of games with explanations intended for those just starting to learn about an opening.
I do not think Chernev's Logical Chess Move by Move is a good choice for an intermediate player. ...
What about a player below 1200?
... You will know when you need to start studying the theory of some opening systems and choosing a repertoire. It is when you realize that you are consistently getting awful positions out of the opening and why, even if you go on to win the games with strong middlegame play. I really can't say when that will happen. ... I suspect opening knowledge does not start to become really important until you are around 2200! ...
"... This book is the first volume in a series of manuals designed for players who are building the foundations of their chess knowledge. The reader will receive the necessary basic knowledge in six areas of the game - tactcs, positional play, strategy, the calculation of variations, the opening and the endgame. ... To make the book entertaining and varied, I have mixed up these different areas, ..." - GM Artur Yusupov
I'm looking for concrete advice on how to get better. I can't find books I like. The topics are usually either too brief with tons of moves or too fast and advanced. I would like good resources mostly books and otherwise. I just don't know what to study and practice and then how to go about doing those things. thanks.
Opening Principles:
Tactics...tactics...tactics...
The objective of development is about improving the value of your pieces by increasing the importance of their roles. Well-developed pieces have more fire-power than undeveloped pieces and they do more in helping you gain control.
Now we will look at 5 practical things you can do to help you achieve your development objective.
They are:
Don’t help your opponent develop.
There are 2 common mistakes whereby you will simply be helping your opponent to develop:
Pre Move Checklist:
Stay away from anything that offers a "system" to find a good move or plan (i.e. a fixed algorithm that you execute - Like Kotov's tree of analysis based on candidate moves ... in "Think Like a Grandmaster" - no GM thinks anything like that) ...
...
... You can get a long way without ever memorising any opening sequences with general principles, positional understanding and feeling, tactical vision, calculating skill and what you have learned from studying games. ...
"... I feel that the main reasons to buy an opening book are to give a good overview of the opening, and to explain general plans and ideas. ..." - GM John Nunn (2006)
"... If the book contains illustrative games, it is worth playing these over first ..." - GM John Nunn (2006)
I do not think Chernev's Logical Chess Move by Move is a good choice for an intermediate player. ...
What about a player below 1200?
It is an even worse choice for a beginner. Perhaps not in the 1960s, but certainly today when there are much better books available. ...
Don't know if you know or care, but the book has been revised.
"... In many ways, it would a wonderful 'first' book (or first 'serious' book, after the ones which teach the rules and elementary mates, for example), and a nice gift for a young player just taking up chess. ... My only warning would be that the impressionable student should be gently reminded by a friend or mentor that most of the rules and principles Chernev so dogmatically states do not actually have any consistent validity in real-world chess, so that the book should be looked at as a way to get started thinking about positions, not as a reliable guideline to what chess is really about. With that proviso, I would recommend it heartily to anyone just starting to explore the game, and therefore, to scholastic chess teachers as well. …" - IM John Watson (1999)
http://theweekinchess.com/john-watson-reviews/assorted-recent-books
The previous review (posted ~58 minutes ago) was also after the revision.
"... 'Chess Fundamentals' ... does not deal so minutely as this book will with the things that beginners need to know. ..." - from Capablanca's A Primer of Chess
"... For let’s make no mistake, what ground Capablanca covers, he covers well. I enjoyed reading Capablanca’s presentation of even well-worn and standard positions. ...
Still, when compared with other instructional books for beginners and intermediate players, Capablanca’s Chess Fundamentals would not be my first choice. Other books cover the same or similar ground with a less confusing structure and more thoroughness. The following works come to mind as equal or in some ways superior: Lasker’s Common Sense in Chess; Znosko-Borovsky’s series of books; and Edward Lasker’s Chess Strategy. Later works that equal or surpass Chess Fundamentals would include Reuben Fine’s Chess the Easy Way and any number of Horowitz tomes.
Capablanca’s work has historical interest and value, of course, and for that reason alone belongs in any chess lover’s library. But there are better instructional books on the market. Certainly the works of Seirawan, Silman, Pandolfini, Polgar, Alburt, etc. are more accessible, speak a more modern idiom, and utilize advances in chess teaching and general pedagogy, etc. ..." - David Kaufman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20131010102057/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review564.pdf
... Chernev's Logical Chess Move by Move ... nowadays there are many much better books available. One such is Nunn's book based on the same idea. But Nunn does not shy away from telling the real reasons and thinking behind the moves, which is often that decades of experiment have revealed a sequence that works. ...
"... most players under 1400, unless they are especially ambitious, will probably find the Nunn book rather daunting. ..."
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092945/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review269.pdf
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Understanding_Chess_Move_by_Move.pdf
Don't buy books. Chess DVDs are awesome. I've been here since 2009 and can't get past 800! Now I'm at 1800ish level due to chess DVDs.
… If you want something slim and lightly annotated, yet correct and not at all misleading, then Stean's "Simple Chess" has never been bettered. But it is an introduction to some important positional ideas and is best studied when a player has developed some tactical vision and is ready to move to the next level.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104258/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review400.pdf
http://store.doverpublications.com/0486424200.html
I do not think Chernev's Logical Chess Move by Move is a good choice for an intermediate player. ...
What about a player below 1200?
It is an even worse choice for a beginner. Perhaps not in the 1960s, but certainly today when there are much better books available. ...
Don't know if you know or care, but the book has been revised.
"... In many ways, it would a wonderful 'first' book (or first 'serious' book, after the ones which teach the rules and elementary mates, for example), and a nice gift for a young player just taking up chess. ... My only warning would be that the impressionable student should be gently reminded by a friend or mentor that most of the rules and principles Chernev so dogmatically states do not actually have any consistent validity in real-world chess, so that the book should be looked at as a way to get started thinking about positions, not as a reliable guideline to what chess is really about. With that proviso, I would recommend it heartily to anyone just starting to explore the game, and therefore, to scholastic chess teachers as well. …" - IM John Watson (1999)
http://theweekinchess.com/john-watson-reviews/assorted-recent-books
The previous review (posted ~58 minutes ago) was also after the revision.
I know it has been revised. It still suffers from the flaws I described, but that Watson describes even better:
"most of the rules and principles Chernev so dogmatically states do not actually have any consistent validity in real-world chess"
I don't think it is any longer a good choice for a beginner or improver. Why do you think it necessary to try to change my opinion? ...
I do not think that it is necessary to try to change your opinion. It does seem to me to be desirable to point out, for example, that IM John Watson, while aware of flaws, nevertheless thought that the revised Chernev book would, in many ways, be "a wonderful 'first' book (or first 'serious' book, after the ones which teach the rules and elementary mates, for example), and a nice gift for a young player just taking up chess."
... As I said, the OP, and anyone else interested in this thread, can read the diverse opinions and differing advice and make up their own minds.
About 100 minutes ago, I tried to provide access to a number of pro and con views about the Chernev book. About 20 minutes ago, I posted a link to a review that comments on Nunn and Chernev.
I looked at some of your games out of curiosity. This one in particular broke my heart lol
At 1200 you don't need some fancy book on planning etc, you need to work on tactics. Also i'll say focus on developing more instead of making too many pawn moves in the opening.
In the game posted in this comment you miss a mate in 2 on move 42
Read Amateur to IM or something like that. ...
"... A2IM is first and foremost an endgame primer. ... I would estimate that much of the basic material would be accessible and useful to players around USCF Class B and C levels, although higher-rated players may also benefit from a refresher here and there. Some parts of A2IM may be of interest to Class D players and others to experts/masters. ..."
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708110922/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review865.pdf
"... The target audience ... is players rated from 1800-2400. ..."
http://www.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Amateur-to-IM-78p3714.htm
http://3harpiesltd.info/dev-mp/excerpts/Amateur-to-IM.pdf
One can see some discussion of the pros and cons of Chernev's Logical Chess at:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132019/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman118.pdf
http://exeterchessclub.org.uk/content/logical-chernev
http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2013/01/logical-chess-book-review.html
http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2013/02/chernevs-errors.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
http://theweekinchess.com/john-watson-reviews/assorted-recent-books
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708091057/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review465.pdf
Here is a review that was, at one time, available online.
Logical Chess Move by Move Author: Irving Chernev
256 pages Batsford (2002, reprint)
Reviewed by Randy Bauer Randy's Rating: 9
In the search for understanding in chess, this book has been a beacon for aspiring players for decades, and Batsford's reprint provides an opportunity for another generation to learn from the author. Perhaps the best testament to its greatness is the fact that Grandmaster John Nunn's outstanding book UNDERSTANDING CHESS MOVE BY MOVE (Click to see Donaldson's and Watson's reviews of Nunn's book.) is recognized as patterned after Chernev's work.
For those who didn't grow up in the era of descriptive notation, Irving Chernev wrote books that mostly appealed to the mainstream player. One of the first books I owned, Chernev's THE FIRESIDE BOOK OF CHESS guided me through the many facets of chess during my formative years. Even though he wrote many other good books (for example, every aspiring player should also own THE MOST INSTRUCTIVE GAMES OF CHESS EVER PLAYED), this is widely recognized as his best.
In this book, Chernev annotates 33 games and comments on each move for both players. His goal is to explain what each player was thinking while making his move. In this way, the reader gets an insight into the rationale behind the moves of and the thought processes of a master player. The author splits the games into three chapters, dealing with kingside attacks (16 games), queen's pawn openings (7 games), and other concepts (10 games). Given the book's original 1957 copyright, it is not surprising that the earliest game is from 1889 and the latest was played in 1952.
The author does a great job of connecting with the reader - one feels that they really are inside the head of the players and that Chernev is explaining what they were thinking while deciding upon their moves. As a result, the games are absorbing and the lessons learned (at least in my case) tend to stick with the player.
I first came across this book at an early stage in my chess career, and I believe that it helped form my understanding of what chess mastery is all about. In fact, one of the games, Blackburne-Blanchard, probably gained me 100 rating points in my class days. I used the structure and natural kingside attack from that game in many, many of my own encounters.
While not a world-class player, Chernev was a prolific writer, and that combination serves the reader well in this book. The author can better relate to the reader and provide them the sort of insight that may be lost on stronger players.
While this is a great book, there are some areas where it is showing its age (having first been issued nearly a half century ago). It is notable, for example, that by far the most popular opening represented is the Queen's Gambit Declined; by contrast, today's favorite Sicilian Defense is found in just one game. There is just one Queen's Indian and one Nimzo-Indian included; there are no games featuring the popular King's Indian, Grunfeld, or Benoni Defenses. The players you will encounter are Capablanca, Tarrasch, and Rubinstein rather than Karpov, Kasparov, and Kramnik.
I had a few quibbles not related to the age of the book as well. I found the print in this reprint to be a little light for my taste, and the diagrams a bit too small. Finally, why oh why are the Chapter headers for each game the site where the game was played rather than the players? "Lodz 1908" doesn't really tell me as much as "Rubinstein-Salwe."
Regardless of these types of issues, this is a very good book. Perhaps it isn't as timeless as it once appeared to me, but it should prove useful to any aspiring player wanting to better understand how to develop logical plans, moves, and thought processes in chess.