hahahaaaa "oups, wrong answer". Yeah, that''s your post #1
I accept that I cheated
Sort:
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
nobodyreally wrote:
Come on people. It's a troll. Read back some pages and you'll see.
please i beg you
it may be troll for u but its serious for me
Then why do you say everything must not have reasons?
brain wants reason and even in chess sometimes we go for the move bc uor gut said
How long did you have the 1st account??
May 27, 2014
0
#125
rogercaptain wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
You said you're willing to post I was a cheater if your acount gets reopened on your wall, but you wont tell us your old username. Why?
I dont know
everything should have reasons
One reason why you'd get a new account instead of reopening an old one is because the old one has a false rating. That false rating affects all other ratings when it is used. Consider all the people that do get 2nd chances and how reopening accounts would affect the rating system on this site.
i'll play at my level if they are better then i will lose, at some point I will reach equlibrium
Yes, but when you lose, you'll inflate other peoples ratings, and theirs wouldn't be accurate. Imagine a 2200 that's actually a 1400 losing to another 1400. Now imagine a bunch of reopened accounts doing the same. See the problem?
rogercaptain wrote:
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
nobodyreally wrote:
Come on people. It's a troll. Read back some pages and you'll see.
please i beg you
it may be troll for u but its serious for me
Then why do you say everything must not have reasons?
brain wants reason and even in chess sometimes we go for the move bc uor gut said
Really dude? Maybe chess.com went with thier gut and banned you. Dont give them reasons to let you back if you dont think reasons are necessary.
Your the repenter, what do you THINK the punishment should be?? Why don't you send flowers to Kohai every day for 2 months.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
How long did you have the 1st account??
1.5 years
You got moved to off topic. The staff has heard your plea. XD
Sunshiny wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
You said you're willing to post I was a cheater if your acount gets reopened on your wall, but you wont tell us your old username. Why?
I dont know
everything should have reasons
One reason why you'd get a new account instead of reopening an old one is because the old one has a false rating. That false rating affects all other ratings when it is used. Consider all the people that do get 2nd chances and how reopening accounts would affect the rating system on this site.
i'll play at my level if they are better then i will lose, at some point I will reach equlibrium
Yes, but when you lose, you'll inflate other peoples ratings, and theirs wouldn't be accurate. Imagine a 2200 that's actually a 1400 losing to another 1400. Now imagine a bunch of reopened accounts doing the same. See the problem?
I was not that high I just used to analyse online games
in live chess I was around 1500
so they banned me bc of online
and why 2200 will play to1400
he will play to 2100,2000 ,....till he gets actual ratings
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
Addicted-to-Chess97 wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
nobodyreally wrote:
Come on people. It's a troll. Read back some pages and you'll see.
please i beg you
it may be troll for u but its serious for me
Then why do you say everything must not have reasons?
brain wants reason and even in chess sometimes we go for the move bc uor gut said
Really dude? Maybe chess.com went with thier gut and banned you. Dont give them reasons to let you back if you dont think reasons are necessary.
chess.com banned me bc i was cheating
my intention was to say everything should not have reason
like I like red color is there a reason for that ?
May 27, 2014
0
#132
I'm considering reporting this account to the staff.
For being a bad lier, a worse debater and an absolutely awfull troll.
Nah, I'll let it go just a little bit longer. It reminds me of a little spider in a toilet bowl.
Just before you flush.
May 27, 2014
0
#133
rogercaptain wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
Yes, but when you lose, you'll inflate other peoples ratings, and theirs wouldn't be accurate. Imagine a 2200 that's actually a 1400 losing to another 1400. Now imagine a bunch of reopened accounts doing the same. See the problem?
I was not that high I just used to analyse online games
in live chess I was around 1500
so they banned me bc of online
and why 2200 will play to1400
he will play to 2100,2000 ,....till he gets actual ratings
Yes, but if they make an exception for you, then it's only fair they make exceptions for everybody else.
Playing from 2200 to 2100 to 2000 means others will be going up. How many people would have to be played? And again, think about it happening with all the reopened accounts.
A second reason would be C.C not wanting cheaters to sit on that high rating and gloat over it. It would make this site look like a joke.
nobodyreally wrote:
I'm considering reporting this account to the staff.
For being a bad lier, a worse debater and an absolutely awfull troll.
Nah, I'll let it go just a little bit longer. It reminds me of a little spider in a toilet bowl.
Just before you flush.
Im still waiting for how far you can get ?
Sunshiny wrote:
rogercaptain wrote:
Sunshiny wrote:
Yes, but when you lose, you'll inflate other peoples ratings, and theirs wouldn't be accurate. Imagine a 2200 that's actually a 1400 losing to another 1400. Now imagine a bunch of reopened accounts doing the same. See the problem?
I was not that high I just used to analyse online games
in live chess I was around 1500
so they banned me bc of online
and why 2200 will play to1400
he will play to 2100,2000 ,....till he gets actual ratings
Yes, but if they make an exception for you, then it's only fair they make exceptions for everybody else.
Playing from 2200 to 2100 to 2000 means others will be going up. How many people would have to be played? And again, think about it happening with all the reopened accounts.
A second reason would be C.C not wanting cheaters to sit on that high rating and gloat over it. It would make this site look like a joke.
I dont know about others but in my case i was just 100 points up my tactic was 1767 highest now i any 1 cant cheat in tactics
Even the OP can't stay on-topic. 1st he wants an account open, now he wants a reason to like the color red. Are you related to Hertzbrocker??
May 27, 2014
0
#138
rogercaptain wrote:
Im still waiting for how far you can get ?
What? Speak english.
erik wrote:
We are not changing our policy.
atleast can you give me my username back
You said you're willing to post I was a cheater if your acount gets reopened on your wall, but you wont tell us your old username. Why?
I dont know
everything should have reasons
One reason why you'd get a new account instead of reopening an old one is because the old one has a false rating. That false rating affects all other ratings when it is used. Consider all the people that do get 2nd chances and how reopening accounts would affect the rating system on this site.
i'll play at my level if they are better then i will lose, at some point I will reach equlibrium