i can beat to magnus carlsen but don´t let me access to elite

Sort:
913Glorax12

Since you started talking

Keep at it! We love laughs!

yedddy
913Glorax12 wrote:

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence. (or lack of)

[really] appreciate you editing my post but i liked it the way i worded it, thanks.

No problem! I am always on everyone's side!

dammit, got me again.

yedddy
913Glorax12 wrote:

Since you started talking

Keep at it! We love laughs!

this guy is kinda funny.

913Glorax12
yedddy wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word. a word used to indicate your level of intelligence. (or lack of)

[really] appreciate you editing my post but i liked it the way i worded it, thanks.

No problem! I am always on everyone's side!

dammit, got me again. B... No! I won't! I am not a jerk!

Opps!

Prudentia
yedddy a écrit :
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word; a word used to indicate your level of intelligence.

You were 'name-calling.'  Everybody knows that dumb was used as an adjective.  By simply refusing to explain to Mersaphe why his logic is flawed (if that's indeed your opinion of his statement), you chose to label him as "dumb."  Of course, you being the punkass that you are, you're going to find some way to prove the rest of society wrong. 

p.s. Calling you a punkass isn't "name-calling."  It was used as an 'adjective' (:P), not to mention I took the time to explain why your logic is flawed. 

913Glorax12

I like this new update they just made

913Glorax12
Prudentia wrote:
yedddy a écrit :
Mersaphe wrote:

i might take your opinion more seriously if you try to explain why you feel that way instead of calling me silly names

actually, calling you dumb wasn't calling you "names". the word dumb as i used it in that sentance was and adjective, a describing word; a word used to indicate your level of intelligence.

You were 'name-calling.'  Everybody knows that dumb was used as an adjective.  By simply refusing to explain to Mersaphe why his logic is flawed (if that's indeed your opinion of his statement), you chose to label him as "dumb."  Of course, you being the punkass that you are, you're going to find some way to prove the rest of society wrong. 

p.s. Calling you a punkass isn't "name-calling."  It was used as an adjective (:P), not to mention I took the time to explain why your logic is flawed. 

We all do that. So you are no different!

yedddy
Prudentia wrote:

You were 'name-calling.'  Everybody knows that dumb was used as an adjective.  By simply refusing to explain to Mersaphe why his logic is flawed (if that's indeed your opinion of his statement), you chose to label him as "dumb."  Of course, you being the punkass that you are, you're going to find some way to prove the rest of society wrong. 

p.s. Calling you a punkass isn't "name-calling."  It was used as an 'adjective' (:P), not to mention I took the time to explain why your logic is flawed. 

nope. he's still dumb. and now, so are you.

913Glorax12

Congradulations! This is a great achievement!

yedddy
Mersaphe wrote:

Please don't call Prudential dumb she's my BFF aka best friends forever

oh. sorry didn't know tht.

913Glorax12

Does it matter?

yedddy
Mersaphe wrote:

I am attempting to gain Prudential's favour, trust, and sympathy by defending her in an Internet forum, therefore I hope she appreciates my efforts. Thus far my feelings have gone unrequited as she merely regards me in a younger brother fashion citing immaturity and impulsivity as my defining characteristics. I need to develop a winning formula for enchanting women

i would say you are already there.

jdesjardins111

ur rediculous. magnus carlsen is the best player in the whole world. some think hes the best of all time. i dont think that...yet haha but hes on track to be. so if uthink ur an over 2900 rated player congratulation cuz that would make u the highest rated player in all of chess. no offense but i dont think that is the case.

kleelof
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

You're as dillusional as the OP.

kleelof
kco wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

Wow you're rude

Wow, you guys are pathetic.

WOW you...you.....you......you have a nondescript username!!

blueemu
Mersaphe wrote:

I am attempting to gain Prudential's favour, trust, and sympathy by defending her in an Internet forum, therefore I hope she appreciates my efforts. Thus far my feelings have gone unrequited as she merely regards me in a younger brother fashion citing immaturity and impulsivity as my defining characteristics. I need to develop a winning formula for enchanting women

I hate to tell you this... but since this is the Internet there is a real possibility that Prudential is in fact an overweight, balding 57-year-old man still living in his mother's basement.

83% of Internet women are exactly that, after all.

(92% of Internet statistics are invented on the spot)

kleelof
yedddy wrote:
Prudentia wrote:

You were 'name-calling.'  Everybody knows that dumb was used as an adjective.  By simply refusing to explain to Mersaphe why his logic is flawed (if that's indeed your opinion of his statement), you chose to label him as "dumb."  Of course, you being the punkass that you are, you're going to find some way to prove the rest of society wrong. 

p.s. Calling you a punkass isn't "name-calling."  It was used as an 'adjective' (:P), not to mention I took the time to explain why your logic is flawed. 

nope. he's still dumb. and now, so are you.

punkass

Laughing

macer75
JohnnyKGB wrote:

Hello guys,  i can beat to magnus carlsen, i know because i was watching their games and now i know how to refutate all the system of this guy.  Also i am training with houdini and others programs and they tell me that my level is 2919  better than carlsen.  

What can i do?   The three KKK  and Carlsen don´t let me access to the private tournaments like  Wijk Aan Zee ,  can you help me?   I am sure i can beat to magnus carlsen .

Lenny Bongcloud, Daeth and MarkaMark's nephew have faced similar predicaments before. I would suggest asking them for help.

913Glorax12
kleelof wrote:
kco wrote:
913Glorax12 wrote:
yedddy wrote:
Mersaphe wrote:

i hate this defeatist mentality most people have where they regard magnus carlsen as some sort of invincible chess god. he can be beaten and i would fancy the chances of many players on this site under the right circumstances to win a game against carlsen. it's not terribly difficult to believe

wow, you're dumb

Wow you're rude

Wow, you guys are pathetic.

WOW you...you.....you......you have a nondescript username!!

Well about time you appear

I can't keep sidetracking this topic forever by myself!

kleelof

You'll have to go it alone for the next few days doggie. It is Mother's day here and we are going to visit my wife's mother. 3 Days of quiet farm living and an endless supply of the most delicious Thai food one could hope to eat.Laughing