2Kd21-0

Jan 31, 2021

0

#121

MervinHenderson wrote:

ChessFreak2020 wrote:

Well, you could hypothetically beat any Grandmaster and computer if you just calculate hundreds of variations and millions of possible outcomes.

I just played a guess the move game ( Morphy vs count of isoduard ) pretty much guessed all the moves right. That means I more or less have the same playing strength as Paul Morphy.

lol just from 1 game

MervinHenderson

Jan 31, 2021

0

#122

2Kd21-0 wrote:

MervinHenderson wrote:

ChessFreak2020 wrote:

Well, you could hypothetically beat any Grandmaster and computer if you just calculate hundreds of variations and millions of possible outcomes.

I just played a guess the move game ( Morphy vs count of isoduard ) pretty much guessed all the moves right. That means I more or less have the same playing strength as Paul Morphy.

lol just from 1 game

Even if it was just one game it was Paul Morphy and most people can't even guess one of his moves right and I guessed like all of them. I could only have done that if I'm like the same level as Paul Morphy

2Kd21-0

Jan 31, 2021

0

#123

MervinHenderson wrote:

2Kd21-0 wrote:

MervinHenderson wrote:

ChessFreak2020 wrote:

Well, you could hypothetically beat any Grandmaster and computer if you just calculate hundreds of variations and millions of possible outcomes.

I just played a guess the move game ( Morphy vs count of isoduard ) pretty much guessed all the moves right. That means I more or less have the same playing strength as Paul Morphy.

lol just from 1 game

Even if it was just one game it was Paul Morphy and most people can't even guess one of his moves right and I guessed like all of them. I could only have done that if I'm like the same level as Paul Morphy

To small of a data set even if you some how played like Paul Morphy his strength now would comparable to an IM nowhere near Viswanathan Anand

JuliusSneezer7

Jan 31, 2021

0

#124

The OP’s been smoking the strong stuff methinks ! ✌️😎

blueemu

Jan 31, 2021

0

#125

> "I could hypothetically beat Vishwanathan Anand if I really wanted to"

MervinHenderson · 2021-01-30T00:53:37-08:00

Doesn't Vishwanathan Anand only see three moves ahead? I read somewhere that he does. Well, I can see more than like ten moves ahead sometimes more. That's what I mean when I say Elo rating isn't everything. You can't just measure ability and talent with a rating. So anyway if I

You could hypothetically fly like a jet plane if you farted hard enough.

isabellabilson

Jan 31, 2021

0

#126

ok

sfxe

Jan 31, 2021

0

#127

MervinHenderson wrote:

2Kd21-0 wrote:

MervinHenderson wrote:

ChessFreak2020 wrote:

Well, you could hypothetically beat any Grandmaster and computer if you just calculate hundreds of variations and millions of possible outcomes.

I just played a guess the move game ( Morphy vs count of isoduard ) pretty much guessed all the moves right. That means I more or less have the same playing strength as Paul Morphy.

lol just from 1 game

DELETED BS

dude

can you please stop trolling? its not funny. its such a shame that there are so many trolls on this site.

ESP-918

Jan 31, 2021

0

#128

Silly rabbit, Anand can win you EASILY blindfolded.

You want to play him so badly? EASY done, pay him 100$K or find a sponsor and he will beat you blindfolded.

PunchboxNET

Jan 31, 2021

0

#129

Play the anand bot. Beat him first with 3 stars, then you might have a chance.

IAmPomi

Jan 31, 2021

0

#130

He'd need a chess.com suscription I think

ESP-918

Feb 1, 2021

0

#131

PunchboxNET wrote:

Play the anand bot. Beat him first with 3 stars, then you might have a chance.

Exactly! No time limits, just they way he likes it.

NM tactic

Feb 1, 2021

0

#132

MervinHenderson wrote:

Dsmith42 wrote:

Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.

Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.

I doubt that; Many chess players can hypothetically think many moves ahead, but very foggy and only clear in simple endgames. For example; I can think 10+ moves ahead in an endgame but foggy beyond 4 in the middlegame.

NM tactic

Feb 1, 2021

0

#133

It's a troll

chamo2074

Feb 1, 2021

0

#134

This guy is right, if he sees 10000 moves ahead he might hypothethciusgdjaghcally beat anand

duntcare

Feb 1, 2021

0

#135

i mean sure, i can do that too but the problem is we cant see that much ahead

duntcare

Feb 1, 2021

0

#136

chamo2074 wrote:

This guy is right, if he sees 10000 moves ahead he might hypothethciusgdjaghcally beat anand

CharacterizedYeet

Feb 1, 2021

0

#137

Steven-ODonoghue wrote:

Did I ask?

y did you post that comment on here then?

tacticspotter

Feb 1, 2021

0

#138

MervinHenderson 写道:

Dsmith42 wrote:

Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.

Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.

Ah yes,thinking about more than a million move variations ahead

CharacterizedYeet

Feb 1, 2021

0

#139

tacticspotter wrote:

MervinHenderson 写道:

Dsmith42 wrote:

Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.

Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.

Ah yes,thinking about more than a million move variations ahead

they do be flexing tho

IAmPomi

Feb 1, 2021

0

#140

tacticspotter wrote:

MervinHenderson 写道:

Dsmith42 wrote:

Anand has the best tactical depth of any active player. He routinely springs combinations 6 and 7 moves deep. You'd have to be GM-class in terms of your own tactics to stand any chance against him. The "Anand only looks three moves deep" statement is kind of like when Richard Reti said he only looks at "one move, but the right one". You're supposed to know better.

Dude...only 6 moves? I can think ten moves ahead.

Ah yes,thinking about more than a million move variations ahead

Not really, you can discard most of them.