I found a psychologic trick to improve your chess results

Ok this is my idea , at the moment i am improving my results, i a morefocus in the game thanks to this new idea .

You must play always thinking the draw is the best result , you even can play very agressive openings o psychotic chess as Hans Niemann says,  but with a drawish attitude,  it seems but contradictory, but actually is the best way to focus and be humble before start a game.

Examples:

Lets say you play against a guy with +100 rating.  You think " ok , i must focus in make a draw because i win elo and is better player than me" 

Now you play a guy with the same rating than you , you think ," ok , a draw is a good result, nothing changes" 

What if you play with a guy -100 rating? You think" the draw is a good result even if i lose Elo, because i have black pieces" " i have white pieces but a draw is a good result anyway, if i lose this game i would lose more points than if i win 3 games in a row against this guy, so a draw is not bad results at all"

- Play for a win o play for a draw?

When you got a position when you gave to decide if trade queens or risk to play for win/lose you must always choose the drawish option,trade the queens.  This concept is important in this drawish philosophy.

When you win a game you will not feel so good as when you draw a game. Of course you must play for a win all the time if your opponent does not want the quick draw. 

I don't think thinking a game that it will lead to a draw is not a good idea and could backfire a lot of time. It could be more useful to clear your mind first of everything that is bothering you and play for a win. In order to do this you have to apply all of things you have learned from the past lessons and games and remind yourself always that there are motives on all of what people are doing. Learning these motives will surely make you see clearly the ideas on why do all of us are doing these moves. That is why chess is a game of minds.

My otb rating is 2060.

In my last tournament, I had a draw against a 2270. I played for a win since he was low on time, but I ended up losing. 

The round after that, I was playing against a 1700. After a botched opening, I sat at -2, but he also botched his advantage and traded off into a six pawns per side with a single knight endgame. After fifty moves and two draw offers by my opponent, I won the game.

Drawing may improve my results, but I'll always play for a win if there are chances. Many times I have turned around games that were drawn to win, mainly against lower rated players, and usually in the endgame.

IMO, it's not good to accept early draws, as it gives you less to learn from - and I still have much to learn, so I don't think I'll be doing this anytime soon.

Honestly, I couldn't agree more. Over the board, especially in longer games, I don't offer or accept draws in equal middlegame positions, as I feel that there is too much play left in the position. Even in drawn rook endgames with at least 4 pawns, I still play it out to either improve my endgame skills or attempt to use the strengths in my position to create something. However, if it is a very dry endgame, such as an easy book draw like bishop and wrong color rook pawn, I accept a draw.

I simplify always in games, but maybe that is why i am only 600 and im trash

But what if you are playing for fun?

I play for fun this is why i play garbage gambits the whole time 

The point is , you play fun Chess but with a very deffensive attitude, as a rock 

If you get a good position you try to win but with any risk.

If you sacrifice a piece for attack you have to calculate the combination perfectly.

Sounds a bit silly, and is contrary to some well known advice i.e. "you shouldn't play with a result in mind, just try to play good moves."

You specifically say your judgement should be swayed by the intended result. This is not objective.

I just always play for the win since there's no reason to make draws. I play for wins all the times except in really drawish endgames.

Anything is possible, but it's more likely that doubting sensible advice results from a less-than-complete understanding.

OP wasn't saying to play the opponent, OP was saying ignore the opponent AND the board, and just play for a draw. I'm guessing they have a risky and undisciplined approach, so this mantra has been useful for them recently. It's a common mistake to assume that because something is useful for you is useful for people in general.

As for me, sure, between static and dynamic advantages I like static because it's a low risk high reward approach.

The best way to get a draw is to play well, obtain an advantage, and then use that advantage as leverage to draw... either by offering a draw directly, or by having more control over the position.

So for example, the advice to trade queens to facilitate a draw is a bit ridiculous. It may work for the OP if historically they've been a player who takes wild risks far too often. Forcing themselves to play more prudently may have increased their results, but it's silly advice in general.

Interesting.