I need help..

Sort:
Avatar of Diakonia

I am an agressive/tactical player looking for agressive, tactically agressive openings that involve agressive, tactical gambits, but arent to agressive, or tactical, but are risky, agressive, and tactical, but not to risky, agressive, or tactical.  Can anyone suggest any highly agressive, tactical openings  that arent overly agressive, or tactical, but involve sacrifices that are agressive, but arent to agressive?

Avatar of EscherehcsE

You must really be bored today. :)

Avatar of The_Chess_Coach

By the way you said aggresive 11 times.

Avatar of thegreat_patzer

you mean oc, losing to <2000 rated players in less than 30 moves.  clearly you need to work on that thought process. lol.

and btw, I can't believe your bored with all the craziness of today.

you need a more wild kind of forum.

dont' ask me to find it. I have no idea where the trolls are thickest. someone in the dark corners of the internet I suppose...

Avatar of ThrillerFan
kstorn wrote:

By the way you said aggresive 11 times.

And was 0 for 11 at spelling it correctly!  2 G's in aggressive!

Of course, he can't spell "too" either.  To = "I am going to the store".  Too = "Too much Too little Too late to ever lie again with you"

 

Also, the first few words already says you aren't ready for opening theory.  The moment you say "I am a tactical player" or "I am a positional player" is the moment that you are NOT a chess player!

To be any good, you have to understand both tactics and strategy, not one or the other!  No opening guarantees a wild or slow game!  I've had in my 2500 tournament games everything from wild Slavs to grind-it-out Najdorfs, from wild Caro-Kanns to quiet King's Gambits!

 

There's a reason why I play things like the Torre or Colle when facing wild fools like the OP, and yet throw in everything but the Kitchen Sink when playing against clowns similar the guy that every few months is asking for slow, boring, uneventful, dull, whatever else openings.

Universal Player = Chess Player

Tactical Player = Chess Player Wannabe

Positional Player = Chess Player Wannabe

Avatar of Diakonia

You guys are awesome and can understand a joke...I may need to raise my online friend standards.  

Avatar of Diakonia
EscherehcsE wrote:

You must really be bored today. :)

Fridays at work are generally slow...

Avatar of Diakonia
kstorn wrote:

By the way you said aggresive 11 times.

Thank You Mr. Abacus :-)

Avatar of Diakonia
Don_frye1 wrote:

1.) you are losing to

Lies!!! all lies!

Avatar of Diakonia
thegreat_patzer wrote:

you mean oc, losing to <2000 rated players in less than 30 moves.  clearly you need to work on that thought process. lol.

and btw, I can't believe your bored with all the craziness of today.

you need a more wild kind of forum.

dont' ask me to find it. I have no idea where the trolls are thickest. someone in the dark corners of the internet I suppose...

Work is slow on Fridays...

I may whack around the chess.com thickets to see if i can stir up a troll nest.

Avatar of Diakonia
ThrillerFan wrote:
kstorn wrote:

By the way you said aggresive 11 times.

And was 0 for 11 at spelling it correctly!  2 G's in aggressive!

Of course, he can't spell "too" either.  To = "I am going to the store".  Too = "Too much Too little Too late to ever lie again with you"

 

Also, the first few words already says you aren't ready for opening theory.  The moment you say "I am a tactical player" or "I am a positional player" is the moment that you are NOT a chess player!

To be any good, you have to understand both tactics and strategy, not one or the other!  No opening guarantees a wild or slow game!  I've had in my 2500 tournament games everything from wild Slavs to grind-it-out Najdorfs, from wild Caro-Kanns to quiet King's Gambits!

 

There's a reason why I play things like the Torre or Colle when facing wild fools like the OP, and yet throw in everything but the Kitchen Sink when playing against clowns similar the guy that every few months is asking for slow, boring, uneventful, dull, whatever else openings.

Universal Player = Chess Player

Tactical Player = Chess Player Wannabe

Positional Player = Chess Player Wannabe

That plane hasnt landed yet...

Avatar of Robert_New_Alekhine

Yu kneed too qwork in yur speiling skeils. Yu mispeled agressive. 

Avatar of Diakonia
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

Yu kneed too qwork in yur speiling skeils. Yu mispeled agressive. 

I WaS TrYiN To B GaNgStA Yo...

Avatar of Diakonia
Robert_New_Alekhine wrote:

Yu kneed too qwork in yur speiling skeils. Yu mispeled agressive. 

"qwork in"?  Is that like twerkin?

Avatar of VLaurenT
Diakonia wrote:

I am an agressive/tactical player looking for agressive, tactically agressive openings that involve agressive, tactical gambits, but arent to agressive, or tactical, but are risky, agressive, and tactical, but not to risky, agressive, or tactical.  Can anyone suggest any highly agressive, tactical openings  that arent overly agressive, or tactical, but involve sacrifices that are agressive, but arent to agressive?

jengias told me that you don't need openings at your level, but only endgames. jengias also told me that should you disagree with this common sense advice, you're an idiot.

Avatar of Diakonia
hicetnunc wrote:
Diakonia wrote:

I am an agressive/tactical player looking for agressive, tactically agressive openings that involve agressive, tactical gambits, but arent to agressive, or tactical, but are risky, agressive, and tactical, but not to risky, agressive, or tactical.  Can anyone suggest any highly agressive, tactical openings  that arent overly agressive, or tactical, but involve sacrifices that are agressive, but arent to agressive?

jengias told me that you don't need openings at your level, but only endgames. jengias also told me that should you disagree with this common sense advice, you're an idiot.

Where is the idiot sign up sheet?