Nope.
I never had this: game over after 32 moves and all opponent's pawns are still on the board!

Highly unusual. Even more so was the game Gligorić won at Palma de Mallorca 1968. His opponent resigned after move 29 with all pieces and pawns still on the board.
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1264288

http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1971646

Highly unusual. Even more so was the game Gligorić won at Palma de Mallorca 1968. His opponent resigned after move 29 with all pieces and pawns still on the board.
You are right, this is even crazier!
This game was weird for a lot of reasons. First for my famous inaccuracy. I saw already in several of my games that I tend to take the simplest path for an advantage, not really trying to find the best moves with the biggest advantages. See for example my 29. Ba5, which wins the exchange, instead of 29. Bd6, getting a whole rook. I played 28. Bf4 planning 29. Ba5, and I didn't check longer for stronger moves. Actually I didn't see that 30.Bxc5 was also trapping the rook.
However, the really crazy thing about the position is the fact that all his pawns where still on the board at the end of game! Did you see something like this before?