I Reach 2000!! What happened with percentil and global ranking???

I am super happy. I pass the 2000 in bullet. Last  2 years I  was so close but never get there. 

I was 99.3% percentil and best 30k one week ago and today i get a huge suprise when I saw 99.9% and position 3687 !!! 

What happened? 

I think this site 'purged' a lot of accounts.

It's broken. My rapid is 1880 and it's showing me world ranking #1800.... There's no way that number is correct

There was an update that had some bugs. Staff are working on resolving the issue.

There's no way it's 3000 ....

Congrats on 2000 rating! That's awesome

@Martin_Stahl must be correct about an update with some bugs though. Your rapid rating is over 2000 and the global ranking shown is #3687 whereas mine is over 2100, yet my global ranking is #3893? lol

They both can't be right if it is in order. The global rankings probably have a display issue.

Actually, maybe it's because yours was bullet, whereas mine was rapid, so that would explain the difference. Same for you @Gottfried94 although I'm sure there is some bug/glitch issue if @Martin_Stahl said so.

At 2000 there are still over 10000 players 😑 if I remember correctly on chess.com 5000 or less is like 2600-2700+(prob still a bit more then that )

The FIDE rating is more realistic than the Chess.com rating , because the Sonneborn-Berger system or the Swiss system is a more realistic rating than the rating that results from a game of a lower rating with a lower rating that does not enter the competition of a higher rating , for example, the first who is in the competition with a lower rating could beat someone with a higher rating, which would in that way reduce their rating more when they lose to a lower rating, until the lower rating would increase more with a higher rating would win , while when players of approximately the same rating play then the rating increase or decrease a little , although the first one of them can be stronger than several of them with a higher rating . So often players with a higher rating leave the game when they see that they have to play with a player with a lower rating, because if by chance they lose, they lose a lot of points, so the rating Chess. coma is not real , It so often happens that a rating of 900 comes among the rights in competition with a rating of 2000 or more

Thanks for the explanation!!

In less than a month you went from second category to CM , compliments

However , in rapid , ELO 900 is less likely to beat ELO 2000 because ELO 900 skips combinations by playing materially ( like NNUE programs that are designed to save time ), so ELO 900 is stronger in blitz and bullet . 
If you play double moves of attack and defense to a player with a low rating, such as a computer, you can easily win him because the low rating is weak in combos, but again for a short time it is necessary to simplify the position because and to higher rating takes time

I played a tournament link

https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/arena/score-based-3min-3s-4232429

and noticed a player with a blitz rating of 2851 and a rapid of 1175 link

https://www.chess.com/member/thekingroulz So what is the real strength of such a player ?

It probably means the 2800+ blitz is their main time control and they almost never play rapid. The 1175 rapid might be for training such as them playing blindfolded or something.