I stand with Vladimir Kramnik!

Obviously Kramnik wasn't trying to kill Naroditsky. He probably assumed that Daniel wouldn't take cyberbullying on the internet so seriously that he would die. I know emotions are high, but let's be objective: Naroditsky was a grown man-- HE was fully responsible for the drugs he took, Kramnik didn't make him take them.

Hans Niemann had the whole world laughing at rumors made up about him that began from Magnus Carlsen's false cheating accusations. Magnus would have been more at fault then Kramnik in each particular case. Hypocrisy maybe?

So you admittedly stand with cyberbullying?

And Kramnik is a grown man. HE is immature and cannot accept losses and accuses everyone of cheating.

And Kramnik is fully responsible for what he says

See how I can turn your own argument against you?

Was thinking that

Daniel unlikely died from kramnik's pressure. He would have had his own mental personal struggles. That being said, Kramik is WAY out of line with everything he has ever said and done. I'm pretty sure I myself am better than kramnik in 3+0 and 1+0 on this website and I would be prompty reported for cheating when he loses to an untilted player

This feels like what people call click bait.

Ok, so who's taller? What if you sit?

The community must be told

This is no place to joke.

It's not?

Kramnik is a bit sad as a former W.C.C (he will be remembered only by his capture of that title when he played Kasparov) However he has done a fantastic job of tarnishing his character over tge last 2+ years by falsely accusing 3 of the elite chess G.Ms and whoever defends hos actions I would suggest best option is to console ones self to his fake unfounded youtube expressions as chess is better off without them!??

No need to make this political, like what is your problem, Maga and kramnik are like the 2 things that wont correlate at all, i mean irs just abt who has wrong information, because anyone who sees the full picture will think kramnik went wayyyyy to far

Objectively, you are making some assumptions here. First off, Kramnnik is alleging drug use, which unless I am missing something is pure speculation. Secondly, you have no idea of what Kramnik was trying to do or not do. And even if we wasn't trying to kill Naroditsky, I think it's clear he was trying to harm him. I think everyone agrees that his behavior was unacceptable at times and so the question becomes, what should be done about it?