SoupSailor72 wrote:
It could take a few hundred games before you beat him.
Nah maybe 40(a draw)
I think the WCM title should not be given out anymore
Sort:
David wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
Given enough games, anyone can beat anyone... but Daniel Naroditsky would be an awfully tough matchup for any 2100 bullet.
(Don’t disturb their delusions of grandeur - they’ll have to leave school and grow up eventually anyway, we should probably let them live their childhood fantasies for a little while longer)
I beat a 2900 before it only took me 10 attempts
Jun 3, 2024
0
#204
SoupSailor72 wrote:
You couldn't even beat me, lol.
that was only one game you weirdo one game doesn't prove anything
Like going you can't beat me but only play one game against me is a bit delusional
Also that was when I was 1800 im 2100 now😑 I highly doubt you could even beat me 4/10 times
Jun 3, 2024
0
#209
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
SoupSailor72 wrote:
You couldn't even beat me, lol.
that was only one game you weirdo one game doesn't prove anything
I'm just kidding around with you lil bro. Don't take it too seriously 
Jun 3, 2024
0
#210
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Also that was when I was 1800 im 2100 now😑 I highly doubt you could even beat me 4/10 times
I think that's a bit arrogant... shall we play?
SoupSailor72 wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Also that was when I was 1800 im 2100 now😑 I highly doubt you could even beat me 4/10 times
I think that's a bit arrogant... shall we play?
Sure if I have a bad day it might take 3 games for me to beat you
Jun 3, 2024
0
#213
basixTheSwexiest wrote:
Did he dodge it?
No, he took the beating head on 
SoupSailor72 wrote:
basixTheSwexiest wrote:
Did he dodge it?
No, he took the beating head on
Eh my playing style is best suited for gms anyway since it weighs heavily on figuring out the other opponents playing style usually it takes me about 15+ games before I get an advantage in win rate
Also ps: you know how I know I can beat a 2900? Because I have beaten a 2900 before do I suck against 2000s yes (in bullet) but do I suck against 2600+ not really lol
basixTheSwexiest wrote:
Did he dodge it?
No sadly it was 4/6 but that's still pretty much a 50/50 win rate so I would not call that crushing me even though he will say it is
chesssblackbelt wrote:
Soup wanna do best of 10 next?
That's what I was thinking aorta like whoever gets 10 wins first
I find bullet here many times unplayable since if you get to 5 secs and not live in north america you are done
this bigchessplayer guy is kinda delusional... i have no idea what they are saying but what i do understand is that they are garbage peepeepoopoo...
i literally beat them so fast
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/110219522025?tab=analysis
asherahgguh wrote:
this bigchessplayer guy is kinda delusional... i have no idea what they are saying but what i do understand is that they are garbage peepeepoopoo...
i literally beat them so fast
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/110219522025?tab=analysis
Says the guy who could only beat me six times
I won the 26 other games...
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
I beat a 2900 before it only took me 10 attempts
Beating a 2900 is impressive.
Though it's hard to say if, after 9 straight games, whether or not the 2900 was even trying anymore.
It's quite possible that they had tucked their A-game away and were simply throwing their B or C-game at you at that point, due to boredom ...
Given enough games, anyone can beat anyone... but Daniel Naroditsky would be an awfully tough matchup for any 2100 bullet.
(Don’t disturb their delusions of grandeur - they’ll have to leave school and grow up eventually anyway, we should probably let them live their childhood fantasies for a little while longer)