good luck with that -_-
I will beat chess world champion
Sort:
I would be happy to beat the darts world champion at chess...
May 11, 2011
0
#4
Awesome ... the same way a grade schooler who aces his first math test just "knows" that he is going to win the Fields medal before he hits junior highschool.
Seriously enough => My old OTB Club president has been 1100-rated for over 20+ years. Extrapolating your reasoning, beating him within weeks of learning the game should make me Master of the Universe? I think there's something wrong here ...
Shivsky wrote:
Awesome ... the same way a grade schooler who aces his first math test just "knows" that he is going to win the Fields medal before he hits junior highschool.
Seriously enough => My old OTB Club president has been 1100-rated for over 20+ years. Extrapolating your reasoning, beating him within weeks of learning the game should make me Master of the Universe? I think there's something wrong here ...
I know it is tough, but i will try my best.
Here_Is_Plenty wrote:
I would be happy to beat the darts world champion at chess...
Dadgum it! You beat me to it.
chesslover308 wrote: " I know it is tough, but i will try my best."
pfft...who doesnt XD
May 11, 2011
0
#8
Not to over-press on being the bitter wise-a##es that we truly are, but here's a common theme to these thread topics:
I think there comes a time in every developing chess playing amateur's "fantastic journey of world domination" when they plateau and then begin to acknowledge, respect and appreciate the skill differential it takes to climb to higher class levels.
For some, this happens at the club classes (E, D, C, B, A) and for others, perhaps at their first title.
The OP has apparently not reached this pothole on his road to progress yet. So I'd wish him luck on his ambitions and when the crash comes (and statistically, it will) I hope it will be soft enough to not make him hate/abandon this game ( or worse yet ... make posts like mine *grin)
When I started out, I used to think Masters were better than me just because they found knight forks faster. :)
I teach the piano my friend, and in my experience after two weeks you're lucky if your students know how to open the lid on the instrument.
Whaaaat? This is incredible. Don't let these fools talk you out of your potential. At your rate of improvement, it will take less than two years.
Honestly, there should be more respect for a player of this caliber. We should be learning from him not berating him. These forumites are just jealous of your burgeoning talent. Can I play a game with you so that I can tell my grandkids that I played a Grandmaster in his early days before he won the championship? It would really mean a lot to me.
chesslover308 wrote:
Playing chess for only three weeks, I am now able to beat a player who has been playing chess for ten years. At this speed of improvement, I am going to be a world champion that will never lose any single game two years later.
d way i played w u ...u can naver b a master..master of words may b...
ReasonableDoubt wrote:
Here's a quote on how to beat a very strong chess player:
"My computer beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kickboxing."
And that's the crux of it. About oh, move 15? I put a choke on Anand, he hangs his queen on touch-move while he's flailing, and I win the prize. That's what now, a lifetime supply of McDonald's coupons?
Here_Is_Plenty wrote:
I would be happy to beat the darts world champion at chess...
That would be an interesting tornemant. Or vice versa?
Jun 1, 2011
0
#15
Heck, forget world champions, I just want to be a master beater. I hear there are websites that help with this ...
chesslover308 wrote:
Playing chess for only three weeks, I am now able to beat a player who has been playing chess for ten years. At this speed of improvement, I am going to be a world champion that will never lose any single game two years later.
You suck!
Well if anything playing chess for you is safer than being on the streets....?
This thread is awesome; if it dies before 50 I'm going to be a slight tad disappointed.
Jun 21, 2011
0
#20
ponnupazoozu wrote:
Shivsky wrote: When I started out, I used to think Masters were better than me just because they found knight forks faster. :)
u mean it's not true? ;-)
Absolutely ... and let me fill you in on a little secret ... those elitist bastards also find discovered attacks and pins faster as well ... but here's what I'm gonna do ... book up 25+ ply of Najdorf theory and play it regardless of what they do ... that should offset this so-called seeing tactics better advantage I keep hearing about.
Playing chess for only three weeks, I am now able to beat a player who has been playing chess for ten years. At this speed of improvement, I am going to be a world champion that will never lose any single game two years later.