If you could add a new rule to chess, what would it be?

Sort:
Avatar of JackRoach

^

Avatar of JackRoach

Or change a rule.

Avatar of Q_x_B

Just once in a game you can skip and turn and take two turns after. You announce you're skipping, the other player gets two turns then you get two turns.

Avatar of JackRoach
Q_x_B wrote:

Just once in a game you can skip and turn and take two turns after. You announce you're skipping, the other player gets two turns then you get two turns.

That's an interesting idea...

Avatar of pianazy

pawns can move 2 squares (torpedo chess) or there is a new piece (8x9 board) with the powers of a knight and bishop, worth 7 points

Avatar of JackRoach
happypi314 wrote:

pawns can move 2 squares (torpedo chess) or there is a new piece (8x9 board) with the powers of a knight and bishop, worth 7 points

2 squares, like, even not on their first turn?

Avatar of blueemu

> "If you could add a new rule to chess, what would it be?"

No whining.

Avatar of pianazy
blueemu wrote:

> "If you could add a new rule to chess, what would it be?"

No whining.

I'm sorry to say that that's impossible,

 

 

 

 

because I exsist

Avatar of JackRoach
blueemu wrote:

> "If you could add a new rule to chess, what would it be?"

No whining.

Yes. Great idea!

Avatar of JackRoach
gdmufz wrote:

allowing to capture own pieces when needed

That would change checkmate patterns completely! No smothered mate, no back rank mate.

Avatar of ResignNowOrLose
If you advance your king to the other end it can turn into a queen
Avatar of Jugyeong

1 chance to takeback within 3 moves

Avatar of R3Ked
ResignNowOrLose wrote:
If you advance your king to the other end it can turn into a queen

You kinda need the king, though...

Avatar of CheemsDr
Being able to get 1 free check on anybody
Avatar of Caremn

You win if you are able to give a good enough reason why you should win.

I'm not that creative, sorry

Avatar of KeSetoKaiba

My rule would be that I can instantly declare a move invalid and declare myself the winner 

(Yugioh reference/memes)

Avatar of KeSetoKaiba

Also, I know someone is going to change stalemate rules - I just know it grin.png

Avatar of KeSetoKaiba
Jugyeong wrote:

1 chance to takeback within 3 moves

Under-rated comment; this could be useful happy.png

Avatar of psychohist

I'd put back the rule that in cases where checkmate requires more than 25 moves, you get double the theoretically required number of moves to checkmate your opponent.

Avatar of Unfoundd1

at the beggining of the game, the 2 kings will be at center allowing the pawns to threaten to attack the kings