If you don’t accept at least one rematch after you win, then you lose.


I have a better idea, how about if a person lose and rematches and loses again he/she loses double the points and if he/she wins he/she gets no points but gets to force his/her next opponent that beats him/her to have a rematch and in that game same thing.
Because this, from just a few days ago, wasn't clear enough?
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/if-you-lose-and-your-opponent-doesnt-except-at-least-one-rematch-then-you-win
I've been playing chess on the internet for 23 years now and at more than a dozen sites. There is not, nor ever has been, any rule, written, unwritten, real or supposed about rematches. Such rules only exist in the fantasy world of those with a need to advance their agenda.
But in the op's fantasy world, you lost. And that's got to hurt. Even if it's in someone else's fantasy world.

This is a topic that has become a pet peeves of mine. Many people used to ignore the notes one could leave on a profile until they were taken away, but I would routinely read them. Many of the notes would say something like "runner, do not play, bad sport" which indicates to me that the player in question didn't grant a rematch and someone was sore about losing. Unfortunately, and I can't stress this enough, *you are not entitled to a rematch.* Period. Full stop, end of sentence. I rarely grant rematches simply because there are so many players out there and I enjoy playing as many different people as possible. If you are unhappy about that, well, that is unfortunate but it's not my problem. Rematches are not required anywhere. Period.

I've been playing chess on the internet for 23 years now and at more than a dozen sites. There is not, nor ever has been, any rule, written, unwritten, real or supposed about rematches. Such rules only exist in the fantasy world of those with a need to advance their agenda.
besides that ? ive been verbally-sexually abused sooo many times, that if i dont resign midgame (even when winning) and do a block ? well, lets just say they arent EVER getting another game against me. done ! gobsa reasons.


Oh, and by the way, Captainbutface, you’re right, it’s two t’s. You’re going to need to take that up with my assistant: Mr. voice dictation.
Agree, minus the bolded portion which reminded the bunny of @gm_proplayer
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/gm-proplayer-were-you-trying-to-reach-me
What about a situation where a player actually had a computer glitch and you won because of it? I'm not speaking of someone making a really bad move but where it is obvious. A queen moves one place short of a capture... I guess you would have decide if someone was being honest about losing due to that. Would you be more inclined to give a rematch if that's the case?

"But daddy, i'm entitled to a rematch, buáááaaa. I wanna, i wanna a rematch with the white pieces. I wanna wanna wanna"

We should arrange a classic OTB match with 24 games (draw odds, two hours for the first 40 moves), so we can (maybe) tell the whole story.
We should arrange a classic OTB match with 24 games (draw odds, two hours for the first 40 moves), so we can (maybe) tell the whole story.
And no going to the toilet in between.