if you know

Sort:
Cystem_Phailure
kenneth67 wrote:

It would be an idea for the system to identify the "deleter". Just a little tag or flag or something. Hello chess.com!!


That's sure to spark a competition to see who can rack up flags the fastest! Cool

kenneth67

Like the demerit drivers licence system. 10 flags and you lose 1000 "member points". 100 flags and you get kicked off the site (licence confiscated). Could be fun!!Laughing

kco

ilikesflag would like that

artfizz
taots_11

thank you eebster.i have another question to you eebster,my question is ''is that true that black pieces in the chess game is always for defense only or it depends who you playing with?.so if your answer is yes that is only for defense well i have another question again to you then.my 2nd question to you is if you  gonna play with the world champion vladimer kramnik and you playing white pieces are you gonna play offensive or defensive.i wait again to your response eebster.

taots_11

thank you too borgqueen.

Eebster
kurogkug wrote:

thank you eebster.i have another question to you eebster,my question is ''is that true that black pieces in the chess game is always for defense only or it depends who you playing with?.so if your answer is yes that is only for defense well i have another question again to you then.my 2nd question to you is if you  gonna play with the world champion vladimer kramnik and you playing white pieces are you gonna play offensive or defensive.i wait again to your response eebster.


Black can play offensively, as Anand showed in game 12 of this last world championship, but grandmasters play more defensively as black on average in most cases. Personally, if given the opportunity to play Kramnik and side advantage, I would play extremely aggresively, because my only chance of winning would be to lure him into a huge blunder.

Eebster
Fiveofswords wrote:

I dont think strong player really understand a difference between 'aggresive' or 'defensive'. The long range nature of most of the pieces make it fairly easy (and best) to always do both things simultaneously. There is risky play and less risky play, but usually risky play is not related to 'aggresion'...it could instead be, for example, snatching material where the opp seems to have a lot of compensation.


I think a distinction can be made between offense and defense in chess, although it is obviously an artificial one, and won't always apply (e.g., it doesn't apply at all to pawnless endgames, generally). In fact, that distinction often is made.

Cystem_Phailure

And some players are more offensive away from the board than when they're playing . . . 

xqsme

( must put a "keeper" in for this thread !)

kenneth67

yes ... it's now on autopilot ... cruising altitude ... life of its own ..(no offence)Smile

Eebster
kenneth67 wrote:

yes ... it's now on autopilot ... cruising altitude ... life of its own ..(no offence)


CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL

taots_11

thank you borgqueen and eebster.

breyerian

I have read this thread front to back.

Thanks for the laughs.

kabawka

just stay for more!

taots_11

hi borgqueen,i have a question.i read the book of kasparov ''the title of the book is ''how life emitates chess.so my question is do you believe in his book ?.and can you give me an example about this book of how life emitates chess.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

breyerian

We all wait again to your response borgqueen. With great anticipation.

Cystem_Phailure

Yeah!  I'm all a'tingle . . . Cool

Eebster

It seems more plausible that chess imitates life.

 . . . I'm just saying.

TheGrobe

Somethings I fear that life may well imitate this thread.

This forum topic has been locked