Like the demerit drivers licence system. 10 flags and you lose 1000 "member points". 100 flags and you get kicked off the site (licence confiscated). Could be fun!!
if you know
Sort:
thank you eebster.i have another question to you eebster,my question is ''is that true that black pieces in the chess game is always for defense only or it depends who you playing with?.so if your answer is yes that is only for defense well i have another question again to you then.my 2nd question to you is if you gonna play with the world champion vladimer kramnik and you playing white pieces are you gonna play offensive or defensive.i wait again to your response eebster.
thank you too borgqueen.
kurogkug wrote:
thank you eebster.i have another question to you eebster,my question is ''is that true that black pieces in the chess game is always for defense only or it depends who you playing with?.so if your answer is yes that is only for defense well i have another question again to you then.my 2nd question to you is if you gonna play with the world champion vladimer kramnik and you playing white pieces are you gonna play offensive or defensive.i wait again to your response eebster.
Black can play offensively, as Anand showed in game 12 of this last world championship, but grandmasters play more defensively as black on average in most cases. Personally, if given the opportunity to play Kramnik and side advantage, I would play extremely aggresively, because my only chance of winning would be to lure him into a huge blunder.
Fiveofswords wrote:
I dont think strong player really understand a difference between 'aggresive' or 'defensive'. The long range nature of most of the pieces make it fairly easy (and best) to always do both things simultaneously. There is risky play and less risky play, but usually risky play is not related to 'aggresion'...it could instead be, for example, snatching material where the opp seems to have a lot of compensation.
I think a distinction can be made between offense and defense in chess, although it is obviously an artificial one, and won't always apply (e.g., it doesn't apply at all to pawnless endgames, generally). In fact, that distinction often is made.
May 17, 2010
0
#609
And some players are more offensive away from the board than when they're playing . . .
( must put a "keeper" in for this thread !)
yes ... it's now on autopilot ... cruising altitude ... life of its own ..(no offence)
kenneth67 wrote:
yes ... it's now on autopilot ... cruising altitude ... life of its own ..(no offence)
CAPS LOCK IS CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL
thank you borgqueen and eebster.
I have read this thread front to back.
Thanks for the laughs.
just stay for more!
hi borgqueen,i have a question.i read the book of kasparov ''the title of the book is ''how life emitates chess.so my question is do you believe in his book ?.and can you give me an example about this book of how life emitates chess.i wait again to your response borgqueen.
We all wait again to your response borgqueen. With great anticipation.
It seems more plausible that chess imitates life.
. . . I'm just saying.
It would be an idea for the system to identify the "deleter". Just a little tag or flag or something. Hello chess.com!!
That's sure to spark a competition to see who can rack up flags the fastest!