if you know

Sort:
taots_11

thank you borgqueen.

lordhypnoz
zxb995511 wrote:
lordhypnoz wrote:

This thread may not have the most number of posts(currently 11th) but I can bet my last dollar that this thread is definitely leading in the number of wisecracks per thread.


I bet you would bet your last dollar...you are from India you probably don't have dollars-(BTW what currency do you guys use over there??)


We use Rupees (INR).

 

P.S. I might just bet my last peseta/euro too :)

theoreticalboy
kurogkug wrote:

thank you borgqueen.


...is it finished?

gasol16

WTH

Eebster
TheGrobe wrote:

There are known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns.  The trick is to eliminate this last category.


Godel might have a word with you.

kenneth67
TheGrobe wrote:

A prerequesite is that the list of things that you don't know be on the list of things that you do know.

There are known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns.  The trick is to eliminate this last category.


The only problem is one may need a frontal lobotomy to qualify, in which case the paradox would be complete, and very sad.

taots_11

hi borgqueen,i have a question to you that i forgot to ask you before.russia is good in chess right?,so my question is i heard in the news in the radio before that russian want to concord the gordia so the usa gonna help the gorgia right?,so 1 guy called to the radio and tell to the news caster that if usa gonna help the gorgia this gonna be the start of world war 3, and the guy again tell to the newscaster that usa gonna be careful because russia is good in chess.so my question is what is the meaning of what the guy said ''that russia is good in chess so usa must be carefull to the russian''?.my guess is may be because russian is good in strategy,or the guy just insulted the russian because chess has nothing to do in war.am i right or wrong borgqueen?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.

Archaic71

yes borgqueen, we await your response . . .

goldendog
kurogkug wrote:

hi borgqueen,i have a question to you


Every kurogkug post needs to be accompanied by a picture of Fonzie jumping the shark tank.

It's been that way for some time....

electricpawn
Fiveofswords wrote:
kurogkug wrote:

hi borgqueen,i have a question to you that i forgot to ask you before.russia is good in chess right?,so my question is i heard in the news in the radio before that russian want to concord the gordia so the usa gonna help the gorgia right?,so 1 guy called to the radio and tell to the news caster that if usa gonna help the gorgia this gonna be the start of world war 3, and the guy again tell to the newscaster that usa gonna be careful because russia is good in chess.so my question is what is the meaning of what the guy said ''that russia is good in chess so usa must be carefull to the russian''?.my guess is may be because russian is good in strategy,or the guy just insulted the russian because chess has nothing to do in war.am i right or wrong borgqueen?.i wait again to your response borgqueen.


 1) sorry to inform you, but russia is no longer significant enough to start world war 3, whether they want to or not, and

2) I dunno where you are gonna pretend to have head heard this...but its obviously a joke. Maybe you dont realize how obvious it is...i really dont know...do you?


Russia has enough nukes to start WW3, and as far as I kow they don't take military advice from China.

Eebster
Fiveofswords wrote:

russia will sit and wait for china to tell them when world war 3 is starting


Hahaha

China telling Russia what to do. Sure, man.


That said, I did make a post regarding a U.S.-China war on a debate forum some time ago, but that was about a conventional war. Nuclear warfare is so different that I don't think it applies very well. Among other things, a nuclear world war could be a very, very short one.

Cystem_Phailure

But there might be really cool looking sunsets for a long time!

gambitgareth

Forget grammatology, forget etymology, forget semiology - 'it' is an hegemonic action, a vis a vis understanding of equity and the feelings of self preservation that arise = 'it'. 'it' could be called anything, for instance, for now or then, I preferred the name trousers fence - so when I want to implement an action (which by the way is always patronising and in itself hegemonic) I pull out my trousers fence in a field that I am compfortable expressing my condition - the whim of an egotist ... is this play?

Cystem_Phailure

The biggest vat of gasoline waiting for a spark is that whacked-out nutjob running North Korea.

bigpoison
Fiveofswords wrote:

 1) sorry to inform you, but russia is no longer significant enough to start world war 3, whether they want to or not, and

 


Oh, man, you're funny!  It's nice to see that your personal hubris spreads to the nation from which you hale!

pdela

gosh!

3rd World War... hope not. It would be the last one...

mottsauce

i like that this has over 50000 views.

electricpawn
Fiveofswords wrote:

If russia just started randomly launching its nuclear arsenal (which is of questionable effectiveness, now that they lack the resources to really maintain such an arsenal in good working order)...it would be considered more of schizophrentic act than a war really. What would russia hope to accomplish this way?


 How much sense did a nuclear war ever make? What has changed from this perstective? A Russia that feels vulnerable and threatened may be more of a danger than the Soviet Union.

Eebster
rahul_theROCKSTAR wrote:

Do you ever read your own posts?

theoreticalboy

I never thought I'd say it, but this thread is currently hosting a conversation stupider than anything kurokug could maintain (though in fairness, he did start it, as usual).

This forum topic has been locked