Improving in Chess

Sort:
DarkMist994

Some statistics on myself:

Rapid: 1135 ratings (hi 1221), ~600games

Blitz: 843 ratings (hi 851), ~200games

And a few games in bullet, that I always timeout so I hate bullet...

.

.

.

How can I improve?

1. Some chess.com lessons have emphasized generating plans. How should I generate a plan?

2. I am relatively defensive and positional, and tend to play slow-developing counterattacks and endgames. Would my performance be improved if I become more attacking?

3. About Openings. The recent drop in rapid rating is contributed by terrible play (for whatever reason) and openings. How much should I know about openings? For example, should I know the book opening of KIA, or I should learn the traps in KIA for white and black? It is really interesting to see most of my games have around 3 book moves while some lines can be over 10 book moves.

4. About Pawn Structures.

Neglect the missing kings. Which pawn structure looks better if it is in a.) middlegame and b.) endgame?

Thank you for your time in reading this post! I would be very grateful if you could drop down some words of wisdom :>

tygxc

"Rapid: 1135 ratings (hi 1221), ~600games"
++ This is a clear sign that you need to prevent blunders. Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it. That alone is enough to get to 1500.

"Blitz: 843 ratings"
++ Do not play blitz or bullet. It breeds bad habits: playing too fast and superficial.

"1. Some chess.com lessons have emphasized generating plans. How should I generate a plan?" ++ Main plan: hang no pieces or pawns.

"2. I am relatively defensive and positional, and tend to play slow-developing counterattacks and endgames. Would my performance be improved if I become more attacking?"
++ No, your performance will probably drop as you will make even more tactical mistakes.

"3. About Openings. The recent drop in rapid rating is contributed by terrible play (for whatever reason) and openings."
++ No, you lose because you hang pieces and pawns, not lose because of the opening.

"How much should I know about openings?" ++ Just the opening principles are enough.

"For example, should I know the book opening of KIA, or I should learn the traps in KIA for white and black?" ++ None of these. Just play. develop pieces into play and control the center.

"It is really interesting to see most of my games have around 3 book moves while some lines can be over 10 book moves." ++ Do not worry about book moves.

"4. About Pawn Structures. Neglect the missing kings." ++ Neglect the essential...

"Which pawn structure looks better if it is in a.) middlegame and b.) endgame?"
++ That depends on the positions of the kings and the other pieces. With a black king on c3 black is better, with a white king on c6 white is better. With a white light square bishop black is better. With a black dark square bishop white is better. With a white knight at d5 white is better. With a black knight on d4 black is better.

DarkMist994
tygxc wrote:

"Rapid: 1135 ratings (hi 1221), ~600games"
++ This is a clear sign that you need to prevent blunders. Always check your intended move is no blunder before you play it. That alone is enough to get to 1500.

"Blitz: 843 ratings"
++ Do not play blitz or bullet. It breeds bad habits: playing too fast and superficial.

"1. Some chess.com lessons have emphasized generating plans. How should I generate a plan?" ++ Main plan: hang no pieces or pawns.

"2. I am relatively defensive and positional, and tend to play slow-developing counterattacks and endgames. Would my performance be improved if I become more attacking?"
++ No, your performance will probably drop as you will make even more tactical mistakes.

"3. About Openings. The recent drop in rapid rating is contributed by terrible play (for whatever reason) and openings."
++ No, you lose because you hang pieces and pawns, not lose because of the opening.

"How much should I know about openings?" ++ Just the opening principles are enough.

"For example, should I know the book opening of KIA, or I should learn the traps in KIA for white and black?" ++ None of these. Just play. develop pieces into play and control the center.

"It is really interesting to see most of my games have around 3 book moves while some lines can be over 10 book moves." ++ Do not worry about book moves.

"4. About Pawn Structures. Neglect the missing kings." ++ Neglect the essential...

"Which pawn structure looks better if it is in a.) middlegame and b.) endgame?"
++ That depends on the positions of the kings and the other pieces. With a black king on c3 black is better, with a white king on c6 white is better. With a white light square bishop black is better. With a black dark square bishop white is better. With a white knight at d5 white is better. With a black knight on d4 black is better.

 

Ah yes, greatly reduce blunders. How do you define blunders?

Eg. 1 Should I be able to calculate a few moves after the move I made to prevent blunders?

Eg. 2 In the context of chess.com, do inaccuracies, mistakes, and missed wins count as blunders that you mean?

tygxc

#3
Eg. 1 In this context a blunder is when you notice after you have played that it was a huge mistake, something you know, but you did not pay enough attention.
In this context the blunder notion depends on your strength.
Hanging a piece is a blunder. Hanging a pawn is a blunder, but may have no consequences at lower level.
If you could prevent the blunder just by assuming your intended move as played and then checking for checks, captures threats, then it is a blunder. The cure is not study, the cure is mental discipline. Sit on your hands! When you see a good move, look for a better one.
If you could not grasp it because it is say 3 moves deep and you can only look 2 moves deep, then it is no blunder, but lacking calculation skill. The cure is then to train tactics, analyse lost games, and study annotated grandmaster games.
Eg. 2 The inaccuracies/mistakes/missed wins do not make much sense, but no, these you probably cannot prevent by blunder checking.

GeorgeWyhv14

My friend has a video on queen sac where he sacrifices the queen and ends up with his bishop pair which he uses his bishops to checkmate black. If you are an aggressive player you can learn a lot from this video of his. His video has great music and he adds notes regarding that particular game of his where he analyze the game. Here is his video on queen sac >>>>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB0ii4rGqas

 This is his youtube channel Chess Learning

DarkMist994
GeorgeWyhv14 wrote:

My friend has a video on queen sac where he sacrifices the queen and ends up with his bishop pair which he uses his bishops to checkmate black. If you are an aggressive player you can learn a lot from this video of his. His video has great music and he adds notes regarding that particular game of his where he analyze the game. Here is his video on queen sac >>>>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yB0ii4rGqas

 This is his youtube channel Chess Learning

Great video surprise.png

Unfortunately, I'm relatively defensive and maybe I can learn the attacking ideas to improve my defense. Thanks anyway happy.png