Yet, he always comes back...
I’m responsible for more than 1/1000 of Comp1-EASY’s losses
Sort:
JunyJunebug wrote:
aravinds_ll wrote:
Yet, he always comes back...
Well, you see, Computer-EASY has the mods on his side, so he is practically invincible.
We must do something about this menace.
Well... apparently demolishing him in thousands of games doesn't work... The guy is a sucker for punishment.
JunyJunebug wrote:
I've tried reporting him, but it clearly has not been working.
... and that's because the staff are in on it! The only way to get justice is to tackle the root of the problem, by replacing the current staff and chess.com elite with representatives of the people who are committed to making this site a better place for everyone! And that is why I am currently running for chess.com staff - to be the voice of the people, and create a movement whereby we can finally take back this site from our oppressors! Take a look at the link below to see my detailed platform, and join the movement! Together, we can #MaceChesscomGreatAgain!
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/support-my-campaign-for-chess-com-staff-member
Oct 21, 2017
0
#5
Why didn't you claim a draw against C-EASY in that 118 move game? You lost your last piece (donated your Queen) on move 62, and then, 56 moves later, a Queen up+, it still had no idea how to mate you?
How come this is not the top post on chess.com/forum????
AussieRookie wrote:
Why didn't you claim a draw against C-EASY in that 118 move game? You lost your last piece (donated your Queen) on move 62, and then, 56 moves later, a Queen up+, it still had no idea how to mate you?
The computer was pushing its pawn, so the 50-move rule didn't apply.
And once the computer got its second queen, it was all over. In K vs K+Q, Comp1-EASY (as well as Comp2-MEDIUM) can't force a checkmate, so you can just play for 50 moves and claim the draw. With 2 queens, however, the computer never fails, so you can just resign.
But anyway... why are we spending so much time talking about one loss, when we could be talking about any of the 96 or so games out of my past 100 that were wins?
what happened?
Zombiesen wrote:
How come this is not the top post on chess.com/forum????
Beats me.
[COMMENT DELETED]
Oct 21, 2017
0
#11
macer75 wrote:
U have a unique way of seeing stuff. I appreciate that. But seeing stuff, like the one you mentioned ain't gonna help anybody. You can do better than this.
(... in rapid & blitz... I couldn't fit that in the title)
Hey guys... so I just discovered something really neat. Currently, I have 3526 wins in total against Computer1-EASY, and virtually all of them are in rapid and blitz - a handful are in bullet, but I only have 29 bullet wins total (out of the 50 bullet games I've played), and most of them aren't against the computer, so that portion is basically negligible. Anyway, looking at Comp1-EASY's stats, it currently has 1,430,992 losses in rapid, and 1,587,856 losses in blitz - so slightly over 3 million losses total in those two categories. If you do the math, then, you'll see that more than 1/1000 of all of the computer's losses in those two categories were against me, which is pretty neat considering how many people play here on chess.com. Even if the 19.6 million accounts stat isn't all that reliable, at this moment alone there are 31178 players in live chess, so think about how many people have played here at some point in the 10-year history of this site.
So... I guess you could say that I'm Computer-EASY's worst enemy. The computer though, to its credit, has always been a good sport about it - it always accepts my challenges and rematch offers, even though it's clear what's going to happen, and never runs away when it's about the get checkmated. So cheers to fair play, I guess!
Are you conducting some sort of social experiment? It can't be that rewarding when your opponent drops a piece on move 5 for he thousandth time.
Harmbtn wrote:
Are you conducting some sort of social experiment? It can't be that rewarding when your opponent drops a piece on move 5 for he thousandth time.
You would be surprised.
can you make a thread so we can keep track of your wins
Joseph_Truelson wrote:
ROL!
I think you mean ROFL... or maybe RAR? Or TROLL? It's hard to tell.
JunyJunebug wrote:
I've tried reporting him, but it clearly has not been working.
Probably for the computer's exceptional style of playing, the staff have made his a staff account as well. So when you report him, the ticket goes right to him, which he can immediately delete or modify so that he's always in the right, no?
Corruption's catching... All the more reason why macer75's movement should be put into effect immediately.
Something fishy is going on for sure, COMP-1-easy is playing 24/7.. I think he's addicted to chess.
(... in rapid & blitz... I couldn't fit that in the title)
Hey guys... so I just discovered something really neat. Currently, I have 3526 wins in total against Computer1-EASY, and virtually all of them are in rapid and blitz - a handful are in bullet, but I only have 29 bullet wins total (out of the 50 bullet games I've played), and most of them aren't against the computer, so that portion is basically negligible. Anyway, looking at Comp1-EASY's stats, it currently has 1,430,992 losses in rapid, and 1,587,856 losses in blitz - so slightly over 3 million losses total in those two categories. If you do the math, then, you'll see that more than 1/1000 of all of the computer's losses in those two categories were against me, which is pretty neat considering how many people play here on chess.com. Even if the 19.6 million accounts stat isn't all that reliable, at this moment alone there are 31178 players in live chess, so think about how many people have played here at some point in the 10-year history of this site.
So... I guess you could say that I'm Computer-EASY's worst enemy. The computer though, to its credit, has always been a good sport about it - it always accepts my challenges and rematch offers, even though it's clear what's going to happen, and never runs away when it's about the get checkmated. So cheers to fair play, I guess!