whoever has luckier premoves wins
Is 1100 considered a respectable and above average rating?
Sort:
Arnav wrote:
whoever has luckier premoves wins
Correction Who ever gets luckier after someone blunders
Sep 15, 2024
0
#247
Arnav wrote:
rapid requires real thiinking unlike blitz
Yep I’m trying to do more repairs now
Sep 15, 2024
0
#250
prince i wouldn't want to date girl at ur school if they care about a rating in chess lol
Optimissed wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
RageDeboi wrote:
Eh I don’t play blitz that much and I’m trying to focus more on rapid now
no one cares about Rapid chess
it won't make you better
All forms of chess make you better but especially, playing slowplay otb games seriously and then analysing them. But you can't play classical controls wellm if you can't blitz and it's also useful to be a good rapid player. As you get into time trouble in classical you have to vary from the kind of slowplay that's appropriate to games when each player has two and a half hours, to the kind of analysis used when each has 90 minutes, and then increase your speed in deliberate stages, but playing, say, the next 5 minutes ar rapid speed and then when you have three minutes left moving to blitz speed and maybe even bullet. Then you reach the time control, you're still in the game and, well, I used to go for a walk at that point, with my clock running, and come back and treat it as a fresh game, because mistakes can be more common just after a time control.
no
OK let's hear your criticisms. OK, I know this thread is just trash talking but see if you can rise to the challenge!
look you can believe what you want to believe. you are free to do that
however, reality is I'm a 2300 level player & you're 1600 blitz. that means that I know a lot more about blitz than you do.
Rapid doesn't make players better at chess
I just looked at your latest blitz game which you won, against Timetocrush. It told me enough to know that you are neither a good tactician, nor someone who has a good grasp of strategic princinples. Your opponent went wrong pretty obviously.
I think you are confusing speed of play with skill. I've played 5 mins chess at a genuine FIDE 2300 level in my time. I was very good. What I've seen tells me you are not of that standard. That was some time in the mid 1990s, whish I was still in my mid 40s.
Half of blitz is time management unless your good at making opponents blunder
Prince_Skywalker wrote:
Arnav wrote:
but luke blitz isn't everything
its the only thing we play
so if you want to be cool then you got to learn blitz better
right now you're not very good at it
girls at my school are rated higher than you & they don't like that.
Actually it's not cool I thought you were a dweeb if you were 2000+ with no life
Pretty accurate tbh
Sep 15, 2024
0
#259
1100 is better than average obviously, but it's not very good at all. Not trying to diss any 1100s but 1100 just really isn't good. I've beaten many and I'm a lowly 830 (rapid).
blitz is just flagging tbh