Is Chess Finally Dead?

Sort:
Tianshuhe

 

Tianshuhe

I LOVE CHESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tianshuhe

Tianshuhe

Hi

 

shivam2627

the user created forum is indian with different country's flag his name 'chess ka khiladi' means a chess Player in hindi

Joeantony1903
👍
Account_Suspended

what is chess ka chutney?

DrSpudnik
toomtoom wrote:

what is chess ka chutney?

It's delicious on Naan!

Account_Suspended

everything is good on naan as we say in USA everything is good on a ritz

I love naan scooping up of sauce...mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Account_Suspended

chess is in the beginning stage of petrification. it's a long process though. you may not be around when it's finally done with.

Lateriflora

Chess is definitely dying.  Elite GMs are copying engines by overplaying the Ruy Lopez and the Queen's Gambit Declined.  It's pretty sad that when commentators replay a game between elites, they're always consulting the engine's evaluation bar.  So what's the point of humans playing the game when their end goal is to play like an engine and when human commentators consult engines all the time.  Chess is a game.  It shouldn't be taken seriously.

moonhowl

chess is the best challenge

Account_Suspended

chess is getting cheesier all the time wink.png

lfPatriotGames
Lateriflora wrote:

Chess is definitely dying.  Elite GMs are copying engines by overplaying the Ruy Lopez and the Queen's Gambit Declined.  It's pretty sad that when commentators replay a game between elites, they're always consulting the engine's evaluation bar.  So what's the point of humans playing the game when their end goal is to play like an engine and when human commentators consult engines all the time.  Chess is a game.  It shouldn't be taken seriously.

It's not taken seriously. The proof of that is in the sponsors and prize money. For chess to be taken seriously it has to be made more fun. 

watchit95
TheGreatOogieBoogie wrote:

yes, there are gazillion permutations assuming every move is equally likely. In reality, however, most of those moves, probably 99% will never be played and the number of playable moves will narrow down as you move deeper into the game. I bet on average at any given time there are about 3 or 4 good moves and that not difficult to memorize

vickalan

Play chess variants. Make the board 10x8, add a few pieces and it's fun again! And there's no chess engines!😀

Steven-ODonoghue
shivam2627 wrote:

the user created forum is indian with different country's flag his name 'chess ka khiladi' means a chess Player in hindi

not forum, thread.

shivam2627

Steven-ODonoghue wrote:

shivam2627 wrote:

the user created forum is indian with different country's flag his name 'chess ka khiladi' means a chess Player in hindi

not forum, thread.

what do you mean?

corum

For more than a century now it has been possible for machines to move faster than humans. However, this has no impact on the vitality of human competition. We still have the Olympics. We still celebrate 'the fastest man on earth' (typically the 100m race winner). 

Machines can also lift more weight than the strongest humans. But we still have human weight-lifting contests. Nobody says that weight lifting is dead. 

I just don't get why some people think that the fact that machines can play better chess than humans should have any impact on the vitality of human competition in chess. 

 

Capn_Haddock

I remember 20-30 years ago people were complaining that chess computers weren't strong enough and didn't offer enough challenge to a skilled player. People were willing to pay a lot of  money to get the strongest chess computers on the market.,

 

Now people can get a chess computer stronger than they could possibly need easily and cheaply, and some people still complain.meh.png