1200 is the masters rating Mickin, get with the program!
Is FIDE Corrupt?
Sort:
Hold up I looked through your list and I noticed something important they're all 40+ years old. People get worse with age maybe they used to be 2500+ and their ratings have dropped with age.
Nvm I checked Nikola spiridonovs peak rating and it was a few points below 2400
Well they all are over 2300 so no
Bit rough to judge Spirindonov when he was born in 1938...
Feb 8, 2019
0
#47
1200 is not even close to what people consider expert level.
https://www.chess.com/article/view/about-chess-ratings
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
MayCaesar wrote:
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
I'm just an amateur?
I'm near 1200 in Blitz. An expert rating should be enough to have an opinion on these things. Educate yourself: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/the-curious-case-of-1200-the-expert-s-rating
Do I know what norms are? Please don't insult me, I know all about norms.
1200 is not an expert rating, it is "I got my feet a bit wet" rating.
1200 is "the expert's rating". I've written about it extensively. It's now almost universally accepted as the expert's rating. There's no need to challenge reality.
Wow glad to know 1200 is the standard for being considered an expert, I have played tourn. chess for 40 years now and my highest rating was 1949 all this time I thought I was just an A class player when in reality according to this I am really a super expert, pretty cool! Now I can really brag to my friends
I think they are. I've always thought it. As a Brit, I believe that corruption is endemic in all international institutions dominated by Europeans.
Everybody is corrupt. Just in varying degrees & many won't admit it. Also, the word corrupt is relative..... so there's that.
This is a troll topic from 2019. Someone just revived it for absolutely no reason.
Oh. Well, I still stand by my comment.
Kenji129_4 wrote:
i did!!
Could you please tell what for? Just curious...
Kenji129_4 wrote:
i searched up on google
About experts with 1200?
magipi wrote:
This is a troll topic from 2019. Someone just revived it for absolutely no reason.
I thought Vladi got an unreasonable amount of criticism.
oregonpatzer wrote:
I am not aware of corruption in the awarding of GM titles, but yes, in other areas, FIDE is the most corrupt international sports organization the world has ever seen. You think the NCAA and the IOC are corrupt (they are), but FIDE does corruption better because they are smarter, probably because they play chess.
FIFA has joined the chat.
16 days ago
0
#58
The FIDE systems so bad that (no cap) if Daniel Dublovs every game unfairly lost, he would have a higher elo then Bobby, who by the way would ALSO have 3000+ elo
" I posted a thrilling thread discussing exactly how easy is it to become a GM. "
And yet your rating is still around 1200. In your posts you often tell us you know "exactly" things where you obviously haven't done your homework and haven't bothered to learn the whole story. Getting a 2500 rating has NEVER, N-E-V-E-R been the sole criteria for a GM title.
So WHY are you claiming it to be so? You said you had a "assumption." And then you continue as if that assumption must be true! Remember that if you ASS/U/me you often make U into something!
This is like assuming you win a medal if you finish an Olympic race, then call the organizers corrupt when only 1st, 2nd, and 3rd get medals!