psychic chess masters

Sort:
waffllemaster

It's not the body of evidence, but how the individual interprets it... that was my point.  I could take your alien evidence and use it to plausibly support the existence of spirits.

ivandh

What? Seeking a consistent logic to arguments and the universe as a whole? That's just what the red-haired freemason Jewish alien ninja turtles want you to believe!

TheGrobe

I was thinking more about the word "people".

BhomasTrown
Estragon wrote:
BhomasTrown wrote:

(artist unknown)

 

Hardly unknown.  That cartoon is one of a series by Icelandic artist Halldór Pétursson, created during the match.

It is copyrighted, too, btw.


Unknown to me...or forgotten heh heh. I had a book on the 1972 championship featuring his illustrations, but I didn't feel like looking for the artists name, so I put artist unknown. Thanks for the artist's name.

Yeah, copyright not so easy on the internet. People can copy and paste endlessly. I think if it's for personal, non-commercial use, who can stop you? But anyways, yes, good to inclued the original artist name if you have it.

ivandh

Don't credit your pictures, the artist might do a google search and find out that you stole them. What they do then is beyond me but it must involve psychic aliens.

waffllemaster

Spirits interact with the physical world all the time.  We know they're physical because radar bounces off them in many cases.  Some however are seen but not picked up on radar, so that's a common misconception that all are incorporeal.

waffllemaster

Unfortunately I think you're not getting my point.  You said it very well so let me steal from you again.

Whether or not aliens are real, we don't pick them up with our most sophisticated technology... little green men and whatnot, to me is a load of rubbish.  I am concerned with the non-ambiguous evidence, not the so-called evidence you are trying to piece together with unsubstantiated facts.

Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:

Don't credit your pictures, the artist might do a google search and find out that you stole them. What they do then is beyond me but it must involve psychic aliens.

Um, Ivan, who is the picture of your avatar of?  Did you plagiarize that, or is it a picture you and your cat?  I mean, you wouldn't want extraterrestrials getting ahold of your furry friend, now, would you? Would you? No, not that furry friend. You know what I meant!

waffllemaster

The reality of unexplained orbs and lights is real.  You're simply twisting everything to support alien life, yet you mock my belief in spirits.

ivandh
reflectivist a écrit :
ivandh wrote:

Don't credit your pictures, the artist might do a google search and find out that you stole them. What they do then is beyond me but it must involve psychic aliens.

Um, Ivan, who is the picture of your avatar of?  Did you plagiarize that, or is it a picture you and your cat?  

Innocent

Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:
reflectivist a écrit :
ivandh wrote:

Don't credit your pictures, the artist might do a google search and find out that you stole them. What they do then is beyond me but it must involve psychic aliens.

Um, Ivan, who is the picture of your avatar of?  Did you plagiarize that, or is it a picture you and your cat?  

 

In all fairness, I edited the post after you quoted me.

ivandh

I believe very much in spirits.

ivandh

When are you going to start another thread whinging about trolls?

Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:

I believe very much in spirits.

You must also have a lot of faith in your liver.

Knightly_News
ivandh wrote:

When are you going to start another thread whinging about trolls?

Ivan - an abjective person such as yourself using an ad hominem attack to rebutt an impassioned but rational case defending the possibility of extraterrestrial UFOs?  Would that make you a troll, or just a fun-loving skeptical scientist?

Irontiger
Master_Valek wrote:

I think you lot do not do internet research, if you question anything written, google is your friend. 

And everything you find via google is guaranteed source, sure. You just have to type the good keywords.

For instance :

http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_moneymisterymagick01.htm

http://au.christiantoday.com/article/rising-breast-cancer-rates-caused-by-abortion-birth-control-pills-says-experts/15044.htm

http://www.911truth.org/

Knightly_News

History of the Flat Earth Society

The modern age of the Flat Earth Society dates back to the early 1800s, when it was founded by Samuel Birley Rowbotham, an English inventor. Samuel Rowbotham's Flat Earth views were based largely on literal interpretation of Bible passages. His system, called Zetetic Astronomy, held that the earth is a flat disk centered at the North Pole and bounded along its southern edge by a wall of ice, with the sun, moon, planets, and stars only a few hundred miles above the surface of the earth. After Rowbotham's death in 1884, followers of his Zetetic Astronomy founded the Universal Zetetic Society.

Flat Earth theory spread to the United States, largely in the town of Zion, Illinois where Christian Catholic Apostolic Church founder John Alexander Dowie and later Wilbur Glenn Voliva promoted Flat Earth theory. Voliva died in 1942 and the church quickly disintegrated. Flat Earthism remained in Zion, gradually becoming less popular into the 1950s.

The International Flat Earth Society was formally founded in 1956 by Samuel Shenton, a Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society and the Royal Geographic Society. Shenton died in 1971 and Charles K. Johnson became president of the International Flat Earth Society. Johnson actively and charistmatically promoted the Society and, over time, its membership increased to over 3,000. His wife Marjory took an active role in the Society as well, often contributing articles to the Flat Earth Society Newsletter.

In 1995, a fire destroyed the Johnson's home as well as all of the Flat Earth Society's library, archives and membership lists. Following a long period of poor health, Charles K. Johnson's wife Marjory Johnson passed away in 1996. He vowed to rebuild the society. Sadly, Charles K. Johnson passed away in 2001 at the age of 76, leaving the Society's future uncertain.

After several years of inactivity, the Flat Earth Society was resurrected in 2004 and remains active today at theflatearthsociety.org.  The Society officially reopened to new members on 30th October 2009.

ivandh

Are those really for actual real?

I need another drink, save me o Spirits!

Knightly_News
Master_Valek wrote:
Irontiger wrote:
Master_Valek wrote:

I think you lot do not do internet research, if you question anything written, google is your friend. 

And everything you find via google is guaranteed source, sure. You just have to type the good keywords.

For instance :

http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_moneymisterymagick01.htm

http://au.christiantoday.com/article/rising-breast-cancer-rates-caused-by-abortion-birth-control-pills-says-experts/15044.htm

http://www.911truth.org/

I was of course, thinking about valuable sources related to the events I discussed. 

 

I have no interest in abduction cases... or most of those links. 

They are f'cking with you because you actually have some passion about your beliefs. They don't really want to know if you have any anecdotal evidence or if there's any viability to your position at all.  They will only accept hard core proof that is commonly accepted or accepted in all the right circles, and if they have to read more than one sentence to find it, they'll jump back into into clown mode at your expense.  You are being trolled because they disagree with you, and you have a history of getting deeply entrenched in positions and seemingly upset. I guess you have to pick your battles.  They see you as easy prey to mock. It makes them feel like big men.

ivandh
reflectivist a écrit :
ivandh wrote:

When are you going to start another thread whinging about trolls?

Ivan - an abjective person such as yourself using an ad hominem attack to rebutt an impassioned but rational case defending the possibility of extraterrestrial UFOs?  Would that make you a troll, or just a fun-loving skeptical scientist?

It was an obsessively tangential relation of the unsubconscious superid of the later foregoing non-skeptical troll of the previously connected threads.