If they had more of a real life community I would sign up for premium. You would be part of a team and know the people on the team are there to learn and not just use databases in daily.
Chess.com could:
1) Get staff to start game threads
2) People would discuss them
3) Those that are trustworthy and show knowledge about the games would be promoted to team leader positions.
4) Team leaders would coach players in sparring tournaments to help them.
5) Chess.com would then randomly make new teams from these players to play in a tournament. The coaches (team leaders) wouldn't know until the tournament started who was on which team. They would also have no incentive to help their players since they would be playing in different tournaments and also against each other.
6) Last, winners would discuss their games, just like post game interviews with the top GM
Yea, if they organized something like that I would gladly pay into it. But if all it is going to be is randomly pairing people who will sign up and play 700 players with 99% accuracy and beat 1500 players also with 99% accuracy, no I will not financially support it with a dime.
Thank You for your inputs. I had reported the cheat to chess.com. They have sent me a message mentioning that they have closed cheater's account and gave me back my rating points which I lost.
Hi,
I want to ask the community that is it worth playing chess here as you get a lot of cheats who play perfect chess. Game analysis will tell 95-99% accuracy at 1000 levels. I was thinking of taking a premium membership but doesn't look worth it anymore. I do want to improve chess but playing against an engine is not worth my time. Please let me know your opinion.