Yet a forum post banging on about someone banging on about something no one has any idea about is perfectly reasonable :p
Is *** the biggest cry baby in Internet chess?

Yet a forum post banging on about someone banging on about something no one has any idea about is perfectly reasonable :p
I believe it is.
In fact, it probably deserves a 2nd thread and a blog entry.
Then I'll be truly winning with Tiger Blood!
Horse and Dog pic is awesome by the way.

Gets my vote for biggest Cry Baby on Chess.com at least.
Absolutely, or at least a top-tier candidate. **** seems to get miffed at others because he can't create coherent posts himself and is always one step behind everyone else.
*mod edit.

Conquistador should teach Photoshop Spam at the post-PhD level.
Then he'd have to cite his sources.

Nope; post-PhD means you're like a Martian-genius, so you don't have to worry about what those idiot humans are doing.
*** , doesn't even come close to being the biggest cry baby. I think the German dweeb (name erased to protect the guilty) was much worse. I would point to the thread, but, alas, it has evaporated. Apparently, the dweeb's topic had an extrememly high volatility. Discuss?
Since do not name and shame does not seem to be sinking in, locked. Mod.
Posting threads about people "Summing up" threads (even though most people have no idea what he's actually banging on about) - starting a blog about the same thing, posting a 2nd thread promoting his blog entry, then blocking people who don't reply in a way he approves of?
Gets my vote for biggest Cry Baby on Chess.com at least.
No naming and shaming please. Mod.