TheRevenant wrote:
Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Pathetic troll" seems a bit unfair - he's arguably the most gifted troll on this site.
Is my jump in rating unprecedented?
Sort:
TheRevenant wrote:
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
TheRevenant wrote:
To all those who answered this threat in earnest without any discernible sarcasm: You realize this guy is just a troll, trying to get a rise out of you all, right? He knows he's a weak player and that there is nothing remotely impressive about his "achievement". And it's also likely that he has long realized that he won't ever get much stronger. Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Chess.com is a safe place for people to come and enjoy. There should be no abusive language, personal attacks, threats, or any other unkind behaviour."
Just saying.
There is nothing in the slightest abusive, threatening, attacking, or unkind about the word pathetic, which means: causing or evoking pity, or sympathetic sadness.
All I'm trying to convey is that VladimirHerceg's writings evoke in me a sympathetic sadness for the man.
This is understandable.
TheRevenant wrote:
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
TheRevenant wrote:
To all those who answered this threat in earnest without any discernible sarcasm: You realize this guy is just a troll, trying to get a rise out of you all, right? He knows he's a weak player and that there is nothing remotely impressive about his "achievement". And it's also likely that he has long realized that he won't ever get much stronger. Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Chess.com is a safe place for people to come and enjoy. There should be no abusive language, personal attacks, threats, or any other unkind behaviour."
Just saying.
There is nothing in the slightest abusive, threatening, attacking, or unkind about the word pathetic, which means: causing or evoking pity, or sympathetic sadness.
All I'm trying to convey is that VladimirHerceg's writings evoke in me a sympathetic sadness for the man.
LOL.
wow, what A burn! nice one!
thegreat_patzer wrote:
TheRevenant wrote:
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
TheRevenant wrote:
To all those who answered this threat in earnest without any discernible sarcasm: You realize this guy is just a troll, trying to get a rise out of you all, right? He knows he's a weak player and that there is nothing remotely impressive about his "achievement". And it's also likely that he has long realized that he won't ever get much stronger. Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Chess.com is a safe place for people to come and enjoy. There should be no abusive language, personal attacks, threats, or any other unkind behaviour."
Just saying.
There is nothing in the slightest abusive, threatening, attacking, or unkind about the word pathetic, which means: causing or evoking pity, or sympathetic sadness.
All I'm trying to convey is that VladimirHerceg's writings evoke in me a sympathetic sadness for the man.
LOL.
wow, what A burn! nice one!
Looks like the meme didn't post.
IpswichMatt escribió:
TheRevenant wrote:
Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Pathetic troll" seems a bit unfair - he's arguably the most gifted troll on this site.
No, he is actually as lame as the other ones. This site has really awful trolls, they do not even try hard.
I've actually fallen back down to 965. Is my drop in rating unprecedented?
2Q1C wrote:
Pashak1989 wrote:
IpswichMatt escribió:
TheRevenant wrote:
Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Pathetic troll" seems a bit unfair - he's arguably the most gifted troll on this site.
No, he is actually as lame as the other ones. This site has really awful trolls, they do not even try hard.
Ohhhhh nice!
Feb 13, 2017
0
#170
Bit unfair wasn't it ? You willingly share your insights into Chess and this is the thanks you get.
IpswichMatt wrote:
Bit unfair wasn't it ? You willingly share your insights into Chess and this is the thanks you get.
It's alright Matt, he tried to make these trollish, and sarcastic comments in one of my other threads: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/a-post-to-help-the-newcomers?page=2
In that thread I basically told him in post 23 how I feel about trolls like him trying to make a mockery of our great game.
It's sometimes tough trying to have intellectual discussions here when there are people simply trying to derail the threads in order to get a laugh.
Feb 13, 2017
0
#172
MyRatingis1523 wrote:
one time i went from 1100 live blitz to 2100 live blitz in around 10 days, i think that kind of improvement is a record
I've seen someone go from 1800 to 3500 in a single day, so no you don't have a record.
Of course, that person got banned within 24 hours...
Feb 13, 2017
0
#173
Nice thread! You blundered at post #24 though, I think you meant to say "The others were objectively superior". This would have been more consistent with your earlier posts.
IpswichMatt wrote:
Nice thread! You blundered at post #24 though, I think you meant to say "The others were objectively superior". This would have been more consistent with your earlier posts.
Good catch! Will edit immediately. It's not just an opinion after all.
kaynight wrote:
OP is so far up himself, he must view the world from his bottom. No offence.
Plenty taken.
OMG. 293 rating points in just a month? In that time I only increased by a little over 400 rating points. I cannot believe that could be possible. Well done.
Feb 13, 2017
0
#178
VladimirHerceg91 wrote:
kaynight wrote:
OP is so far up himself, he must view the world from his bottom. No offence.
Plenty taken.
and i thought having eyes at the back was a compliment ...
I just increased 180 points in Bullet in 9 hours. Take that GMHerceg!
Arguably more impressive... so joining the world's top 10 is arguably less impressive than improving rapidly after learning the game. Of course your rating increased rapidly after starting out!
Whenever I become concerned [political insult removed - MOD], I go to the chess.com forums and find someone from another country of even lower intellect.
To all those who answered this threat in earnest without any discernible sarcasm: You realize this guy is just a troll, trying to get a rise out of you all, right? He knows he's a weak player and that there is nothing remotely impressive about his "achievement". And it's also likely that he has long realized that he won't ever get much stronger. Out of frustration, he has turned into a pathetic troll.
"Chess.com is a safe place for people to come and enjoy. There should be no abusive language, personal attacks, threats, or any other unkind behaviour."
Just saying.