everyone did. thegrobe and i were the only ones. it's embarrassing.
Is trysts, trysts?
everyone did. thegrobe and i were the only ones. it's embarrassing.
I also left at some point. I guess there were just the three of you left, and maybe dunce too, when the deletion bomb fell. I dully complained about that in a thread of mine.
I don't know if Trysts is Trysts, but I haven't felt like myself lately. Who am I ? Somebody help!
You haven't felt yourself lately? Good sex life or over the hill?
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
Perhaps we should consider the current incarnation of trysts to be either the original or an impostor. We cannot know which until we apply some external stimulus (extolling the virtues of the Coast Guard, Christianity, the IDF, criticsing the modern defence etc). Until that time she exists in an indeterminate state. I propose that we call this experiment Schrodinger's Lush
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
Perhaps we should consider the current incarnation of trysts to be either the original or an impostor. We cannot know which until we apply some external stimulus (extolling the virtues of the Coast Guard, Christianity, the IDF, criticsing the modern defence etc). Until that time she exists in an indeterminate state. I propose that we call this experiment Schrodinger's Lush
I like your methodology and the name "Schrodinger's Lush," but I feel the topics may scare the subject in the initial stage of the experiment.
Just put her in a maze with cheese in the center. The obstacles and dead ends could be christianity, America, the right talk at a bar conversation, ect.
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
In another thread, you suggested the "Linda Blair Test." Mention God. If she pees on the floor while her head spins...it's trysts.
P.S. I really wish I hadn't remembered that.
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
In another thread, you suggested the "Linda Blair Test." Mention God. If she pees on the floor while her head spins...it's trysts.
P.S. I really wish I hadn't remembered that.
This is an example of the inflammatory stimulus I was hoping to avoid! This may have caused her to curl up in a corner and begin sobbing!
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
In another thread, you suggested the "Linda Blair Test." Mention God. If she pees on the floor while her head spins...it's trysts.
P.S. I really wish I hadn't remembered that.
This is an example of the inflammatory stimulus I was hoping to avoid! This may have caused her to curl up in a corner and begin sobbing!
If that happens, we have detected an imposter.
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
In another thread, you suggested the "Linda Blair Test." Mention God. If she pees on the floor while her head spins...it's trysts.
P.S. I really wish I hadn't remembered that.
This is an example of the inflammatory stimulus I was hoping to avoid! This may have caused her to curl up in a corner and begin sobbing!
If that happens, we have detected an imposter.
Yes! How can we detect the phenomenon if it occurs?
Let's design an experiment that will help us determine whether Trysts is really Trysts. We will provide stimulus that we think the real Trysts would respond to under normal circumstances in this environment.
We will start with something that the subject would not normally consider inflammatory. Stimulus that could be considered inflammatory may scare the subject away in the early stages of the experiment.
@Trysts: My new favorite drink is a shot of Knob Creek with an Amstel Light chaser!
No need for the experiment. Real life conditions have provided enough proof to make me reconsider. Yes, it's official. Trysts just recently had another anti-religious rant in a now deleted thread on religion. She also expressed provocative satisfaction in her assumpion that I don't appreciate her views on such subjects in this very thread. Haven't you been reading this thread from the beggining?
All this information and remarks have been provided before as well. Bad pawn, bad pawn. You don't get to promote on the next chess game! (lol)
Nick, I think it would be impolite and impolitic to inquire too closely about a lady's short absence. There are many possible explanations, none of which are our affair.
She might have been avoiding some persistent stalker, on a steamy romantic getaway in a remote and unconnected location, gone undercover for some nonviolent agency investigating religious propaganda, or just visiting a sick friend.
Whatever it was, just be glad she came back as soon as she did, looking younger and apparently having lost a bit of weight (not that she needed to).
IOW, you should all just shut up, suck up, and straighten up.
I was careful not to delve into her privacies. I was just being suspicious about the behaviour change. Almost no suspicions left now.
Case closed? I can shed my anxiety about possible experiments which poor little mice go through?
With this crowd, I'd be more worried about gerbils . . .
Yuk!
Yes, how strange to have a thread opened up, by someone I never even heard of until today, calling me a "menace", a "monster", "disgusting", and being compared to the exorcist by others. But, you were quite nice to me Estragon. Thanks.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I think I stayed away from it because I have little recollection of it. And it probably wasn't that epic if I stayed away from it, though there are exceptions such as If You Know.