itchymei-mscratch wrote:
lets try it here. lichess
The David side of my split personality is bursting to do something about that.
Just won the most EPIC game ever!
Sort:
Bilbo21 wrote:
itchymei-mscratch wrote:
lets try it here. lichess
The David side of my split personality is bursting to do something about that.
Lol! So you've been keeping up with everything while you were gone!
li-li-li (psssssshhhhhh) li-li-li-li-li-li-li-----li-li-li (psssssssshhhhh) lichess.
anyone spot the simon and garfunkel connection ?
macer75 wrote:
Bilbo21 wrote:
itchymei-mscratch wrote:
lets try it here. lichess
The David side of my split personality is bursting to do something about that.
Lol! So you've been keeping up with everything while you were gone!
Not while I was gone, but you preserved that part neatly in a thread, presumably as my monthly briefing.
Bilbo21 escribió:
macer75 wrote:
Bilbo21 wrote:
itchymei-mscratch wrote:
lets try it here. lichess
The David side of my split personality is bursting to do something about that.
Lol! So you've been keeping up with everything while you were gone!
Not while I was gone, but you preserved that part neatly in a thread, presumably as my monthly briefing.
I don't get what you two are talking about, did I miss a thread or is it something simple that my twisted mind struggles to understand?
itchymei-mscratch escribió:
li-li-li (psssssshhhhhh) li-li-li-li-li-li-li-----li-li-li (psssssssshhhhh) lichess.
anyone spot the simon and garfunkel connection ?
Dear Irish cat (iirc some call you chris?),
I wonder why you like opening and closing accounts so much. I would pleased if you explained it, because your short-lived accounts really intrigue me, as you are always easily recognizable and don't seem to be trying to hide from anyone.
Regards,
Somebody who has nothing better to do than writing this.
Bilbo21 wrote:
macer75 wrote:
Bilbo21 wrote:
itchymei-mscratch wrote:
lets try it here. lichess
The David side of my split personality is bursting to do something about that.
Lol! So you've been keeping up with everything while you were gone!
Not while I was gone, but you preserved that part neatly in a thread, presumably as my monthly briefing.
I see... that makes sense.
By the way, it looks like Kingofshedinjas is muted. He tried comenting on this thread, but I can't see the comment. I wonder what happened...
Far worse news, his account has been closed. I think he said something like he had a last warning about something but I can't remember what it was.
Just wanted to give my sincere condolences to team black who played amazingly but couldn’t finish it off. I feel your pain. Please know you did play a good game though. I think this game may have even changed my perspective on Chess entirely. White played “good looking” moves but he was losing until the end and I was reminded of my own play.
I want to give it to the Blacks too... They should win this game...
For example... The Move number 74... It would be better for blacks... to move their Queen on g 5... And you could lose this game... could you ? 
))
Man, in the end of game... (after move number 73).... Blacks had Queen.. you had only Knight and one pawn... You should lose anyway.
PolicyDebater, you wrote that you thought "that game may have even changed your perspective on Chess entirely."
In which way did it change your view of Chess game ?
It's very interesting...
By the way I found another mistake of Blacks in the end of the game... 72 move... They should move Queen on d5... not on c3 !
And it was not difficult... but very simple decision for any chess player.
gabrucho wrote:
Dude, I'm sorry, but you should not be proud of that game. You almost lost to a guy that is about 200 points lower than you. A horrible game played by both sides.
I agree that was a very horrible game
okay
wasn't 34...Rxe3+ a basic 0-1?
Sucks
varelse1 wrote:
okay
wasn't 34...Rxe3+ a basic 0-1?
Yes... like I said, that's the one mistake black made in the game.
😂😂😂😂 Chess also a comic sense!
This was not your brilliancy, but rather your opponents time pressure. Losing that last queen was just your opponents problem.
lets try it here. lichess