could the people in this forum please shut up i cant fid my post and im tired of the notifications talk somewhere else this FORUM IS [CLOSED]
ok i shall.
could the people in this forum please shut up i cant fid my post and im tired of the notifications talk somewhere else this FORUM IS [CLOSED]
ok i shall.
So it seems that there are a few people out there who for some reason weren't particularly impressed by my last game. But not to worry - I have so many more impressive victories that I can showcase. Take for instance this one:
What do you guys think?
Impressive win. Black was a low rated player that valued material over the strategical elements of chess! What a fool, I am glad you punished him with the superior position of your pieces.
Any man who mocks this game is either too poor of a player to understand the complex ideas at hand or simply jealous of your strategical ability. This game is easily on par with world championship rounds, if not even more deep.
game is went good only wrong went about black that he played in accurate + let the f4 pawn reach f6 . this means that he did not defend is king well.
Hmm. You did win, but it's too outrageous for me to see someone lose two queens for a knight and a rook in an endgame! Either black was playing... well, bad, or this was a pre arranged game. Likely not, but...
in accurate hahahahahahhahahaha
cool grammar
OH! i am sorry for wrong grammer but it is understood.
the best quality is that you didnt give up.even when you were dead lost and you find an epic royal fork. not an epic game overall.. just a swindle
I completely disagree with your move on 18. Looks like you forced the xray attack when you had 18.Rxa6 ....Rxa6. 19.bg5 f/u by taking rook on a6 w/ queen and then Re1
Black looked good to me (or at least better than white...) until he blundered the bishop. Then white just sits back and lets black get 2 queens when they shouldn't of even got 1. My question is why wasn't 36.Rxc4+ followed by 37.Rc7 played? It looks absolutely winning to me.
agreed