yes d4 is actually good at attacking
king's pawn opening is so overrated
Sort:
May 19, 2021
0
#43
laserpro1234 wrote:
laserpro1234 wrote:
andyvonameln wrote:
laserpro1234 hat geschrieben:
so many people do it and I find it very annoying when people play e4 and I'm black
yes, but you can play c5 and you might have a great game with Sizilian Defense ...
Not my type of opening
My type is attacking but being safe and not losing material
Queen's pawn opening chirogin variation does both
Should you really be referring to yourself as an "attacking" player when you're losing in 6 moves by missing a simple tactic?
https://www.chess.com/game/live/15105993695?username=laserpro1234
May 19, 2021
0
#44
wtf is the Queens Pawn Chigorin variation, do you play the Veresov attack? or the Jobava London? which one?
May 20, 2021
0
#46
IMBacon wrote:
laserpro1234 wrote:
laserpro1234 wrote:
andyvonameln wrote:
laserpro1234 hat geschrieben:
so many people do it and I find it very annoying when people play e4 and I'm black
yes, but you can play c5 and you might have a great game with Sizilian Defense ...
Not my type of opening
My type is attacking but being safe and not losing material
Queen's pawn opening chirogin variation does both
Should you really be referring to yourself as an "attacking" player when you're losing in 6 moves by missing a simple tactic?
https://www.chess.com/game/live/15105993695?username=laserpro1234
did you realize that I am much better at attacking than defending
I think e4 definitely feels a little more raw and aggressive. It's decent, but it definitely makes people forget d4, which feels more refined. I guess I'd say e4 isn't bad, but it makes d4 underrated.