Magnus Carlsen is an embarrassment

Sort:
Kjetil_Amanaki

So why did the OP call Carlsen an Embarrassment to the chess? when it is not even Carlsen`s fault the matchis only 12 games then if no winner it is rapid.My thought is that if Caruana won the Rapid and become the World Champion this tread would never been created.

HolographWars
Kjetil_Amanaki wrote:

So why did the OP call Carlsen an Embarrassment to the chess? when it is not even Carlsen`s fault the matchis only 12 games then if no winner it is rapid.My thought is that if Caruana won the Rapid and become the World Champion this tread would never been created.

There are norwegians on this site... Like u

Kjetil_Amanaki

Yes and?

I think most of Norwegians would accept if Caruana won. and let him feel the happiness from the players who admire his game. I would personally be happy for Caruana if he won. And would never call him a embarressment.

I understand Americans are fan of Caruana just like Norwegians are fan of Carlsen. But in the end The Championship are only a game.

MathsMaths0

"We can't propose better conditions for a better match" yet some people are getting pretty rude to each other.

Scandinav12345

No reason to blame Magnus. He is just a part of a wide spread trend towards defensive play, not ambitious, creative and courageous way of playing. I look forward to a new Bobby Fisher. 

Justs99171
Kjetil_Amanaki wrote:

Yes and?

I think most of Norwegians would accept if Caruana won. and let him feel the happiness from the players who admire his game. I would personally be happy for Caruana if he won. And would never call him a embarressment.

I understand Americans are fan of Caruana just like Norwegians are fan of Carlsen. But in the end The Championship are only a game.

 

More like Norwegians are fans of Carlsen and Americans don't give a rat's @$$.

The guy who started this thread was calling Carlsen an embarrassment to chess for offering a draw in a better position.

I personally think it should have ended as a drawn match, with Carlsen retaining the title. This would have also driven Carlsen to offer a draw in a better position. Maybe then no body would call him a disgrace?

It seems people are more angry about the tie breakers and 12 draws than Carlsen's actions … after all, his actions were a result of the circumstances.

Justs99171
MathsMaths0 wrote:

"We can't propose better conditions for a better match" yet some people are getting pretty rude to each other.

 

I'm a big fan of being rude to stupid people. I define stupid people as people that don't agree with me.

HolographWars
Justs99171 wrote:
MathsMaths0 wrote:

"We can't propose better conditions for a better match" yet some people are getting pretty rude to each other.

 

I'm a big fan of being rude to stupid people. I define stupid people as people that don't agree with me.

...am I stupid? 

hint: look at my rating

Justs99171
HolographWars wrote:
Justs99171 wrote:
MathsMaths0 wrote:

"We can't propose better conditions for a better match" yet some people are getting pretty rude to each other.

 

I'm a big fan of being rude to stupid people. I define stupid people as people that don't agree with me.

...am I stupid? 

hint: look at my rating

 

Ratings and standardized test scores don't matter. Agreeing with me is all that matters.

Kjetil_Amanaki

LOL 

HolographWars

Ok then...

Titled_Patzer

The ignorance being shown here goes  beyond the sensibilities of objectivity. Think because a computer gives a +1 evaluation, a position is winning? How little these people understand the game they play. The quality of chess between the two best human chess players was of the highest level. Defensive skills have improved greatly, no longer is chess simply about attack, attack throw caution to the wind. If the opponent does not make a mistake, this tactic results in a loss. In blitz, go for it. Humans will err. But it is classical chess, the WC should be decided by such. 

It's hard to understand that this thread and many of the posts are made by chess players. 

Never underestimate the stupidity of the average [not by rating] chess player. There was 1 game where a "win" was missed. [It's a match between two human players].  With the comments made in this thread, a non-playing observer might conclude the posters here think they would win the games. Complete rubbish of course. All I see are young kids seeking attention, showing no respect for MC and FC.

RW63

1) In one of the earlier games, FC offered a draw to MC when he was ahead just a tad, and when he might have won that game. MC felt he 'owed' FC such a favour as a matter of gentleman's etiquette.

2) He knew he would be much stronger than FC in rapid games, so he made that play to his advantage. It was simply a tactical/strategic decision.

3) We don't know about backroom deals/pressures. Chess world is as dirty as the world of other sports. From top officials to the betting mafia, there are many influencers. Maybe both players were 'steered' towards playing 12 draws in a row because almost no one in the world would have bet on that happening before the duel had started, so there was a lot of money lost by the betting community.

In the end, the better player won. Of course, leave it to the internet to disparage that... Some random chess.com user 'criticizes' the Champion of the World... It's like a basketball street hustler dissing Michael Jordan for missing one three pointer in an important game. Everyone's a f*ing critic nowadays. If you've got anything to say about top chess players in the world - go and prove yourself against them, or shut the f up.

 

 

Titled_Patzer

To suggest the chess world is "dirty", that either MC or FC would even consider "match fixing" is IRRESPONSIBLE and shameful. Certainly, FIDE has issues over credibility. But to include the top players in the world, making claims they are dishonest and taking bribes, borders on being liable.

The "betting mafia" and "a lot of money lost" over the WC Match??? Total horse manure. Just another example of the stupidity being expressed in this thread.  

jamestg2

carlsen is a merciless faggotball

HolographWars

Never heard of a person being a ball-shaped bassoon. Interesting

jamestg2

carlsen, go fukk yourself

SamsonRomanChessakov


SamsonRomanChessakov

 


#602
After learned consideration, taking on board much consultative advice and examining both sides of the argument! I declare this debate to be a a draw!

Justs99171
SamsonRomanChessakov wrote:


SamsonRomanChessakov

 


#602
After learned consideration, taking on board much consultative advice and examining both sides of the argument! I declare this debate to be a a draw!

 

It's definitely not a draw. The match was drawn, but the debate was not.

badenwurtca

Well okay then let us ask ourselves who is the World Champion at this point ? Why it is none other than Magnus Carlsen !!! Never mind the haters, the many envious clowns, Carlsen is still the World Champ, any more questions  lol.