Mandatory rematch accepts?

Sort:
BorpB0rpImA737
1300 > 800
wanmokewan

Leave.

cellomaster8
No duh wanmokewan doesn’t play those time controls so they’re 800
wanmokewan
cellomaster8 wrote:
No duh wanmokewan doesn’t play those time controls so they’re 800

Not to get all Elsa on you, but please let it go.

FBloggs
wanmokewan wrote:

Why can't people just shut up about this already?  The OP is a donkey crevice who is never going to change his attitude because it causes conflict.  Ignore him already.

Yeah, I should've ignored him as you did.  I wish I had your self-restraint.  Then I would've passed by this thread without even taking a second look - never mind stopping to post a comment.  wink.png

Chef-KOdAwAri
Such an obvious troll looking for attention is obvious... why feed him?
FBloggs
Lenudan wrote:
Such an obvious troll looking for attention is obvious... why feed him?

By "feed him," do you mean posting to his thread?

Tja_05

BorpB0rpImA737 wrote:

Sometimes I'll totally outplay the opponent positionally and tactically the whole game, only for them to get a lucky mate when I'm not looking. That's not fair. If I'm losing rating points to an obviously inferior player, I want the ability to earn them back. I can think of many times when I was crushing my opponent, and than I got distracted and lost. I just want the ability to prove my superiority over these players and get my rating to its proper place (probably 1800 ish)

Well now, they had to be very good to get that lucky mate. It's completely fair. Instead of complaining about it, why don't you beat some more patzers if you truly believe what you said?

Tja_05

BorpB0rpImA737 wrote:

1300 > 800

1500>1300. You lose.

cellomaster8
Wanmokean who is Elsa
lillograve

I agree with the possibility to losing points when you don't give a rematch, but not as much as if you lose a game. Maybe half, or a percentile