Forums

Memory and analysis improvement

Sort:
chess_hopeless

Hello everybody! My first post in this excellent chess community.

Being a terrible chess player, I have often wondered what could be the ways to improve my game. I noticed that I am really bad at memorizing chessboard positions or openings and, more important, at in-depth analysis of the coming moves (mine and of my opponent).

I have friends who can easily, after a match, rebuild some past positions and think ahead many moves in a clear way. In my case, I can think ahead 2/3 moves, then the pictures becomes very foggy...

Are there any exercises or books meant for improving this specific area of chess playing?

Thanks a lot and glad to be part of the community!

Chess_Hopeless

 


silentfilmstar13

I don't think that the problem is your memory, but that you're having to remember much more than your friends.  As you continue to play games and grow as a player, you'll begin to recognize patterns.  Once you can start remembering the position by pawn structure and tactical possibilities, it makes reconstructing the board much easier.  You are currently having to remember all 64 squares, rather than a few key blocks with the rest falling into place.  I would suggest not spending as much time focusing on this aspect, but tactics and strategies.  Strategies in particular will help you think of the board as a whole.

chess_hopeless
silentfilmstar13 wrote:

I don't think that the problem is your memory, but that you're having to remember much more than your friends.  As you continue to play games and grow as a player, you'll begin to recognize patterns.  Once you can start remembering the position by pawn structure and tactical possibilities, it makes reconstructing the board much easier.  You are currently having to remember all 64 squares, rather than a few key blocks with the rest falling into place.  I would suggest not spending as much time focusing on this aspect, but tactics and strategies.  Strategies in particular will help you think of the board as a whole.


 I definitely agree. How about thinking ahead?

 Thanks a lot!!


likesforests

chess_hopeless> "I noticed that I am really bad at ... in-depth analysis of the coming moves (mine and of my opponent). How about thinking ahead?"

 

A good way to improve your skill at tactical calculation... is to spend more time calculating! But seriously, some worthwhile approaches are:

 

1. Play slow games where you get to spend more time analyzing each position but are still time-restricted. G/45 or G/60 for example. You might also aim for openings that lead to early tactics for this purpose.

 

2. Analyze master games, especially tactical ones from the Romantic era of chess. For example, Morphy or Anderssen are good choices.

 

3. There are also books on calculation like "Excelling at Chess Calculation" which focus on common thought-process mistakes while calculating. These are worth skimming through, but put more focus on the first two methods.


chess_hopeless
likesforests wrote:

chess_hopeless> "I noticed that I am really bad at ... in-depth analysis of the coming moves (mine and of my opponent). How about thinking ahead?"

 

A good way to improve your skill at tactical calculation... is to spend more time calculating! But seriously, some worthwhile approaches are:

 

1. Play slow games where you get to spend more time analyzing each position but are still time-restricted. G/45 or G/60 for example. You might also aim for openings that lead to early tactics for this purpose.

 

2. Analyze master games, especially tactical ones from the Romantic era of chess. For example, Morphy or Anderssen are good choices.

 

3. There are also books on calculation like "Excelling at Chess Calculation" which focus on common thought-process mistakes while calculating. These are worth skimming through, but put more focus on the first two methods.


 Will do! Thanks a lot for answering.


silentfilmstar13
I agree with likesforests.  Also, when studying combinations, keep in mind that the concepts are the most important part.  For instance, don't look at a piece sacrifice, then try to make a winning combination from it.  That's a very common thought process, I believe, but again more work than necessary.  You should first look for undefended or underdefended pieces, an exposed or partially exposed king, or a king with no legal squares to run to.  If those things don't exist, looking for a combination is useless.