There was a bunch of us that thought about going, and we decided against it. We all relaized that sandbaggers, and people that hadnt played in years would suddenly show up. And except fot the top 2 sections we were right.
Millionaire Chess Haters...
Sort:
cavallo2014 wrote:
I've made a post in the hope to gather people going to the Millionaire Chess tournament, and discuss ideas upon training, or general ideas upon such great tournament.
Instead a group of haters: bmeck, maskedbishop (in all his accounts) etc. just made endless posts to show their trolling skills.
Wouldn't chess.com be a better place without haters and trolls?
My proposal would be to limit the troll accounts to let's say 100 messages max. How do you propose cc determines who the trolls are? When they reach their trolling quota, automatically the account it's stopped from spitting more hate.
Would chess be really considered a sport for smart people, if the public would be aware of trolls of this kind?
Come on, let's try to improve chess image!
After hundreds of years of this game being played, I don't think limiting certain members of a single website from posting beyond any number of posts will improve the game's image.
AlCzervik wrote:
cavallo2014 wrote:
I've made a post in the hope to gather people going to the Millionaire Chess tournament, and discuss ideas upon training, or general ideas upon such great tournament.
Instead a group of haters: bmeck, maskedbishop (in all his accounts) etc. just made endless posts to show their trolling skills.
Wouldn't chess.com be a better place without haters and trolls?
My proposal would be to limit the troll accounts to let's say 100 messages max. How do you propose cc determines who the trolls are? When they reach their trolling quota, automatically the account it's stopped from spitting more hate.
Would chess be really considered a sport for smart people, if the public would be aware of trolls of this kind?
Come on, let's try to improve chess image!
After hundreds of years of this game being played, I don't think limiting certain members of a single website from posting beyond any number of posts will improve the game's image.
Trying to "weed" out certain people for the betterment of others, sounds stragely like Nazi Germany.
I've made a post in the hope to gather people going to the Millionaire Chess tournament, and discuss ideas upon training, or general ideas upon such great tournament.
Instead a group of haters: bmeck, maskedbishop (in all his accounts) etc. just made endless posts to show their trolling skills.
Wouldn't chess.com be a better place without haters and trolls?
My proposal would be to limit the troll accounts to let's say 100 messages max. When they reach their trolling quota, automatically the account it's stopped from spitting more hate.
Would chess be really considered a sport for smart people, if the public would be aware of trolls of this kind?
Come on, let's try to improve chess image!