MY IMMORTAL

Sort:
bot977

MajorGiggles

12. ... Bxh2+?

13. Kh1??

If White plays (the fairly obvious) 13. Kxh2 then:

13. ... Ng4+

14. Kg3 Qxa8

15. f3 Ngf6

16. e4

And white is 4 points of material up, totally safe and winning.

White is also fine/winning after 14. Kh3 too (all other moves the same).

The issue begins on move 10. You say "I did not like my position here so I made it into my favor", but more correct is "I make a mistake that takes me from a dead-level position to a difficult position. Luckily my opponent messes up too and lets me off the hook."

Casual_Joe

Nice attack.  Not objectively perfect, but none of us play perfect games.  Good job.

bastiaan

Just wondering: do understand the concept of an immortal game? It seems quite childish in this context.

theboomtowncat

Nice!

MyNameIsAdis

Very nice powerfull attack.

theboomtowncat

went in with all guns blazing and did a real Clint Eastwood job!

MyNameIsAdis

This player shared a very nice game with us. He has abosulutelly right to name it, whatever he wonts. Dont be so hard in your posts.

MyNameIsAdis

theboomtowncat wrote:

went in with all guns blazing and did a real Clint Eastwood job!

Bla, bla and bla.. :)

theboomtowncat

Wu hoo, picked up a stalker today! Lucky me!

rematchers are like, some kinda stalker type then! cool!!

MyNameIsAdis

theboomtowncat wrote:

Wu hoo, picked up a stalker today! Lucky me!

rematchers are like, some kinda stalker type then! cool!!

All what will I say is simply bla, bla & bla ☺

GnrfFrtzl
AndrewKutches írta:

Normally the immortal games exist because oponents mistake so i dont know whats is the childish thing anyway

I guess it's childish because no one calls their own games immortal. You let the future decide that.

TheGreatOogieBoogie

queenside fianchettoing after ...d5 before castling and playing Nbd7?  Exchanging the fianchettoed bishop for a knight effectively surrendering the central light squares and weakening your own queen side while giving the opponent the bishop pair not to mention activating his bishop to a more active post (to those very same weak squares you surrendered)!? 

A good point for you however is playing ...dxc4! Your idea to use d5 as a pivot square for your pieces is while winning a tempo (the white bishop moved twice), and opening the bishop's line while not original is certainly a good one.

...h5?? simply blunders the exchange.  True the bishop is far more active than your rook, but in the long run white's superior material should tell. 

12...Bxh2?? 13.Kxh2,Qxa8 14.f3 is a stable and decisive advantage for white. 

theboomtowncat

tnx mr bla!

stick it up your ahhh!

Zoundz

If immortal means poor quality and quickly forgotten, yea... It's an immortal all right.

Not that there's a problem with the chess, it's probably more of a problem with English.