My Problem With The Current Rules Of Daily Games!!!

Sort:
Avatar of gotham_chess_glazer

wait so you can literally use an analysis while playing isn't that cheating?

Avatar of TheMidnightExpress12
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:

The whole idea is that daily chess is like correspondence chess. Since it's not live, it's ok to check out opening databases. Realistically, no one's getting checkmated in the opening, anyway

Yes but when does it become engine based???

It's the difference between something you can study and something you can't.

Opening tablebases are useful because the opening is always the same.

Engines are useful because they work for EVERY position. That's more OP, wouldn't you say?

Yes i know but what is stopping cheaters from using the engine even if its just a couple of moves more

Because it's against the rules? Chess.com cheat detection? Morals?

Yes i know but my point is that it makes chess.com cheat detection harder in daily games compared to other formats.

Avatar of 7thDuckz

Cheating's just a big problem to begin with.

Avatar of Sebu13
betterthanty11 wrote:

wait so you can literally use an analysis while playing isn't that cheating?

The whole point of daily chess is to use analysis, as long as you analyze using only your own brain and not some software. Your rating of 1164 is really good btw, if you aren't using the analysis board at all. You could probably gain 500 elo by using it.

Avatar of Cake_Ninja456_ForReal

Ok, so I don't do this, but how exactly will they know if we're using help from others? It's not like they're stalking everything we do... This rule doesn't make sense at all lol

Avatar of GM_PalMarkIsBack

we kinda dont need this cause we arlreadz know this

Avatar of Qoiuoiuoiuoiu
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:

The whole idea is that daily chess is like correspondence chess. Since it's not live, it's ok to check out opening databases. Realistically, no one's getting checkmated in the opening, anyway

Yes but when does it become engine based???

It's the difference between something you can study and something you can't.

Opening tablebases are useful because the opening is always the same.

Engines are useful because they work for EVERY position. That's more OP, wouldn't you say?

Yes i know but what is stopping cheaters from using the engine even if its just a couple of moves more

Because it's against the rules? Chess.com cheat detection? Morals?

Yes i know but my point is that it makes chess.com cheat detection harder in daily games compared to other formats.

...in the opening? No one's going to be blundering in the opening, and I'm sure you know opening tablebases don't usually help after move 5-6

Avatar of TheMidnightExpress12
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
wrote:

The whole idea is that daily chess is like correspondence chess. Since it's not live, it's ok to check out opening databases. Realistically, no one's getting checkmated in the opening, anyway

Yes but when does it become engine based???

It's the difference between something you can study and something you can't.

Opening tablebases are useful because the opening is always the same.

Engines are useful because they work for EVERY position. That's more OP, wouldn't you say?

Yes i know but what is stopping cheaters from using the engine even if its just a couple of moves more

Because it's against the rules? Chess.com cheat detection? Morals?

Yes i know but my point is that it makes chess.com cheat detection harder in daily games compared to other formats.

...in the opening? No one's going to be blundering in the opening, and I'm sure you know opening tablebases don't usually help after move 5-6

Yeah true the rules where just confusing

Avatar of Chikchek0113
Faith_in_Him wrote:

Oh k

respect to your name

Avatar of Aadhish-Athiappan

hi

Avatar of TheMidnightExpress12

Yo