Myers-Briggs Types and Chess


  • 10 months ago · Quote · #101

    AlCzervik

    We'll put you in the long-winded category.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #102

    Ella-Bonjela

    nemo ?

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #103

    AlCzervik

    or maybe a relative.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #104

    GLMyFriend

    Hello folks. I'm an INTJ. I'm also a personality-theory hobbyist. The first post I noticed here outlined four dichotomies (NF, NT, SF, and SP) which doesn't really do well to differentiate types of people in chess or in any other matter. But anyways, figured I'd chime in on a topic that you all may find interesting.

     

    Some people focus on a logical "way of thinking" called "Ti." This is a focus on logical systems, rules, and laws. xNTPs, xSFJs, xSTPs, and xNFJs all share this focus, and thus will often perform better playing positional as opposed to tactical games; they will identify systems of attack (openings) and general principles (passed pawns, outposts, etc.) as strategic rules to achieve, and pursue them accordingly.

     

    The other half of the people will focus more on "Te." From this vantage point, rules and laws are less important while points of efficiency and leverage are focused. These individuals will often perform better tactically, and play more varied games. They will likely try gambits and sacrificial plays. xNTJs, xNFPs, xSFPs, and xSTJs are all Te-types.

     

    Neither Ti nor Te has anything to do with training, memory, IQ, or other arbitrary factors which people like to try and associate with personality--so anyone can be successful playing any way. But there will be tendencies and patterns if you know what to look for!

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #105

    DrSpudnik

    I'm an EIEIO. I have an oink oink here and an oink oink there.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #106

    MAGP96

    I'm an ENFP any other NF chess players out there? I realize this is an NT past time.

  • 5 months ago · Quote · #107

    krazy21

    ENTP and INTJ would be best at chess in my opinion because both have inuitive functions at the top of their functional stacks, hence seeing the bigger picture better than other types, whilst also having a thinking function second on their functional stacks, giving them a rational mindest to each problem. ENTJ and INTP as well as ENFP and INFJ would also be quite good, but not as much as the first two, I would imagine. I am an INTP and MBTI types are more than a mixture of just 4 dichotomies. You must look at the functions to truly understand MBTI.  

  • 5 months ago · Quote · #108

    Nimzov9

    Well said krazy21.  As an INTJ, and having been a programmer/analyst now cataloging librarian, you describe the levels of functions well.


Back to Top

Post your reply: