20295 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
We'll put you in the long-winded category.
or maybe a relative.
Hello folks. I'm an INTJ. I'm also a personality-theory hobbyist. The first post I noticed here outlined four dichotomies (NF, NT, SF, and SP) which doesn't really do well to differentiate types of people in chess or in any other matter. But anyways, figured I'd chime in on a topic that you all may find interesting.
Some people focus on a logical "way of thinking" called "Ti." This is a focus on logical systems, rules, and laws. xNTPs, xSFJs, xSTPs, and xNFJs all share this focus, and thus will often perform better playing positional as opposed to tactical games; they will identify systems of attack (openings) and general principles (passed pawns, outposts, etc.) as strategic rules to achieve, and pursue them accordingly.
The other half of the people will focus more on "Te." From this vantage point, rules and laws are less important while points of efficiency and leverage are focused. These individuals will often perform better tactically, and play more varied games. They will likely try gambits and sacrificial plays. xNTJs, xNFPs, xSFPs, and xSTJs are all Te-types.
Neither Ti nor Te has anything to do with training, memory, IQ, or other arbitrary factors which people like to try and associate with personality--so anyone can be successful playing any way. But there will be tendencies and patterns if you know what to look for!
I'm an EIEIO. I have an oink oink here and an oink oink there.
I'm an ENFP any other NF chess players out there? I realize this is an NT past time.
ENTP and INTJ would be best at chess in my opinion because both have inuitive functions at the top of their functional stacks, hence seeing the bigger picture better than other types, whilst also having a thinking function second on their functional stacks, giving them a rational mindest to each problem. ENTJ and INTP as well as ENFP and INFJ would also be quite good, but not as much as the first two, I would imagine. I am an INTP and MBTI types are more than a mixture of just 4 dichotomies. You must look at the functions to truly understand MBTI.
Well said krazy21. As an INTJ, and having been a programmer/analyst now cataloging librarian, you describe the levels of functions well.
kopec system ; nf3 variation
by Jenium a few minutes ago
What are your top 3 pieces of advice for new players?
by skua12 a few minutes ago
5/28/2016 - Overworked and Under Paid
by Melayia 4 minutes ago
Played beautifully and lost. Help!
by Inexorable88 5 minutes ago
how does 2. e5 fare against the sicillian?
by jengaias 6 minutes ago
To fold, or not to fold?
by ouija1979 6 minutes ago
Using opening books in Arena?
by EscherehcsE 8 minutes ago
Official Staunton's Piatagorsky Set--A Great Reproduction of an Historic Set
by cgrau 25 minutes ago
Fritz 15 seems slow
by The_4th_Stonewall 27 minutes ago
youre worst mistake in chess :)
by gerberk 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!