New FEATURE REQUEST: THIS IS AWESOME!!

Sort:
Avatar of AMcHarg
immortalgamer wrote:

Yeah...not the same.  Not really even similar.


This depends what you mean by similar, they are similar (in a way) Cool.  Anyway, it's a good idea!

Avatar of amac7079

let me translate, not similar means not exactly like what immortalgamer proposed therefore clearly inferior and not worthy of consideration. i would point out that immortalgamer an opportunity to support Erik and the site with a more thoughtful response regarding the specific chess mentor lessons I referred to. Had someone actually done the lessons that I refer to, they would see that it is more than a little similar with the exception that you have to study the relevant game on your own in advance if someone just wanted to match moves. however, if you understand the theory involved or can derive the theory from the board positon and objectives, you can work out proper move sequences. Memorizing random games that are not played soundly (which is most games) does not seem to be all that worthwhile of an exercise. 

Avatar of immortalgamer

Memorizing GM games is a worthwhile exercise both for memory and for chess playing ability. 

As is guess the move.

Thanks for you comment.  Usually the more concise and answer the more profound.