12605 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Is there a 3rd choice?
Yes. See post #14.
I suppose the notion of studying chess with a friend is depressing to some.
It's important to phrase all choices as binary, and irrevocable.
That keeps life simple for the (slightly) pinheaded OP.
With dozens of ways to improve your game, why post a binary choice? Duh?
I think you can learn a lot from playing someone you can beat easily.
by knowing why you can beat the other person, if you can see what errors lead to your victory. you may even realize some mistakes that you make yourself if the other person makes them even bigger.as a rule always try to players other +200always play people lower than you -200 or more to see that you can capitalize on their errors.
Thanks to all who answered my question appropriately and genuinely, and even offering new ideas of how to deal with my advantage (namely handicaps, I hadn't thought of that), though me playing a stronger player is simply not an option at my school team meetings as I can beat everyone consistently (HaHa, I know, you're probably thinking we're gonna suck, come tournament weekend, you're probably right, but chess is fun and improving as an individuals and a team is all that matters to us)
As for the following comment:
This is actually not true, I would love to teach and help my friends get better so we could at least have a small chance of getting a trophy at the tournament.
As for the following insults to me:
"It's important to phrase all choices as binary, and irrevocable.
That keeps life simple for the (slightly) pinheaded OP."
a completely unnecessary statement, considering I'm not a pinhead and can obviously handle more than 2 choices at once (how else would I still be a sane, functioning man), I just wanted to keep the thread title short.
"Ok, maybe the poor bast*rd needs a fourth choice. The top three lead to him taking his own life".
Why would you even say that, it's just plain stupid.
I just want to do the best I can to improve as a player. So either answer the question appropriately (I'm open to new suggestions, I just didn't want the thread title to be too long, and keep in mind playing better player is not an option in this situation) or just don't comment, seriously
Set your "open seeks" on plus and minus 150 points. That way you will at least get 5 rating points from the lowest rated players who accept.
If you want stronger opponents, choose their "open seeks," when possible. Nuff said?
Still a mighty dumb original question. Sorry.
It's not dumb, you just don't understand it. My question is regarding playing otb where internet is unavailable
If it's OTB and you have no internet, then what other choice do you have? Play chess or don't. That's simple!
If playing OTB then depending on your relationship with them, you can use it as a teaching aid or consider playing a handicap - eg time differential if you use clocks, or submit a piece - start with 3 pawns (eg a minor piece) and reduce the handicap as they beat you! (or increase if they can't)
And I'm too dumb to understand his original post.
Is there a cliff we can both jump off, together, @Tubester?
@rMr.Bob is apparently 14 years old. What does that make us? Bosom buddies on the edge of a cliff? Delightful.
We are not worthy, @Bob. More power to you!
The @Bobster is in his salad years. Still feeling his oats.
Any other mixed metaphors we might judiciously add?
SCID vs PC
by Faarian a few minutes ago
4/29/2016 - Bird's Opening, From's Gambit Analysis
by poseidon2012 a few minutes ago
I have an answer..And I know I'm right.
by rmanthony 2 minutes ago
iPhone app issue?
by lacdesign 3 minutes ago
Kasparov is slaughtering Nakamura and So.
by BettorOffSingle 6 minutes ago
by bunicula 7 minutes ago
Minor piece sacrifice for castling rights
by Pursuantspy 9 minutes ago
by RonaldJosephCote 12 minutes ago
Chess.com's Weekly Study: January 17th 2016
by fightingbob 13 minutes ago
The Sicilian Dragon
by 1stKnight619 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!