Please get rid of that stupid checkmate rule !!

Sort:
Avatar of qixel

Do you know how many games of chess I lose because of that ridiculous checkmate rule?

Please remove it from this site immediately !! Frown

Avatar of benws

I don't quite understand your question.

If you want checkmate to be removed from the site, then how will anyone ever win another game of chess? After all, isn't that the object of the game itself?

Avatar of fbobobby

which rule?

Avatar of BirdsDaWord

Qixel, we have reported your request to the governing bodies that be.  We will be creating an alternate form of chess per your request...are there any other rules you would like changed?  How about a 7-day free vacation to DisneyWorld before the start of every game?  Wink  

Avatar of IOliveira

Finally a rule sugestion that makes sense.

Checkmate isn't logical at all. Even when a player has a massive material advantage, there is this stupid rule that he loses when his King in taken. That is not fair at all.

lol.

Avatar of Jett_Crowdis

I was playing an OTB game and when my opponent was about to checkmate i kindly (and rather forcefully) ask the rules official whether it was possible to declare checkmate null and void. Needless to say, he just stared at me. He rudely said if i couldnt take the game seriously i shouldnt play at all.

Avatar of Stinkbug22
snakesbelly wrote:
Wow...if this was my thread there would be a whole posse of head hunters with pitch forks and torches on my back screaming 'Troll' and reporting me to the staff. Personally I can't even see why there should be a King at all but for fear of my life I have never dared to write a thread about it. You seem to be immune....a new breed of genetically advanced troll? I am impressed...a mutant .... I am not worthy

When I saw the title of this thread, I thought FOR SURE that it would be you, snakesbelly.

Guess I was wrong.

It's a SUPER-TROLL!

Avatar of IOliveira

snakesbelly,

It is easy to claim you already had that idea when another person gives it.

You had a chance for making this great contribution to the game but did nothing. You should quit chess forever, to forget such a shameful waste of opportunity.

Avatar of ajmeroski

Maybe not according strictly to the topic, but I lately I wondered why King  is weak piece that needs care and Queen is the strongest piece on the board. Doesn't quite make sense for me.

Avatar of digitalknight

I think this idea has merit for the children. We must consider their self esteem.

Avatar of Live_For_Chess

wow

Avatar of plotsin

I really, really hope that this is a joke. The whole point of the game is to surround the enemy king whilst keeping your own king safe. If you don't like the check-mate rule in regular chess then you deserve a 501 rating...
@ll-oliveira: If you have a huge material advantage and you lose, then it's your own fault for blowing it. If you want an example of this in real life, then research the battle of Littlebig Horn. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Little_Bighorn

Avatar of Scottrf

Laughing

Can't believe anyone took this seriously.

Avatar of gregkurrell

I like the checkmate rule.  But I can't always do it in my lightning games, even when up a piece. So let's consider abolishing the time rule ;-)

Avatar of gregkurrell
[COMMENT DELETED]
Avatar of msjenned
Stinkbug22 wrote:
snakesbelly wrote:
Wow...if this was my thread there would be a whole posse of head hunters with pitch forks and torches on my back screaming 'Troll' and reporting me to the staff. Personally I can't even see why there should be a King at all but for fear of my life I have never dared to write a thread about it. You seem to be immune....a new breed of genetically advanced troll? I am impressed...a mutant .... I am not worthy

When I saw the title of this thread, I thought FOR SURE that it would be you, snakesbelly.

Guess I was wrong.

It's a SUPER-TROLL!

I was thinking the same thing. It had a reptilian hallmark. 

Avatar of gattaca

It's not a troll thread, OP humorously refers to all the threads about suppressing rules which annoys those who can't comply to (stalemate, pawn promotion...).

Avatar of gattaca
snakesbelly wrote:
gattaca wrote:

It's not a troll thread, OP humorously refers to all the threads about suppressing rules which annoys those who can't comply to (stalemate, pawn promotion...).

No man ...the Super immune mutant troll theory holds a lot more water.

I did not say she's not a troll, I said the thread was not 'troll' but rather a joke in reply to the whiners.

Avatar of msjenned

Mr Snakey says, "It will be pistols at sunrise i believe."


I like to be there too. Name the place. I will not need guns. I will kung-fu you.

Avatar of gattaca
snakesbelly wrote:
gattaca wrote:
snakesbelly wrote:
gattaca wrote:

It's not a troll thread, OP humorously refers to all the threads about suppressing rules which annoys those who can't comply to (stalemate, pawn promotion...).

No man ...the Super immune mutant troll theory holds a lot more water.

I did not say she's not a troll, I said the thread was not 'troll' but rather a joke in reply to the whiners.

Sir/Madam you go too far ....my objections to pawn promotion was very legit as the queen used to be a terribly weak piece hence pawns got promoted to queens 'only' then queens became all powerful and as a gross oversight the rule was never adjusted accordingly.

Refering to me as a 'whiner' is akin to a slap in the face with your glove.

It will be pistols at sunrise i believe.

Note that I made no remark about your analysis skills nor did I refer to you as a whiner. Laughing