Problem with chess.com leagues

Sort:
GavinTheKing668

So I see about two million people in the Legend Leauge, and I see tons of 400 rated players, which means that they just are in there and play tons of games, oblivious to their REAL rating. Sure, there is an occasional good player rising from the low levels, but do these low rated legends really deserve legend Leauge?

DepressoEspresso01

Oop

IeJoker

Absolutely... Why the heck would they not deserve it? It's about the amount of games you play... It's not about rating

IeJoker

The reason why there are so many lower rated players is because that is the vast majority

GavinTheKing668

They just spam games, that doesn't deserve it/

GavinTheKing668

The vast majority?

IeJoker

Who cares if they spam games... Is there anything wrong with that?? Leagues don't even matter... So what is the point?

DepressoEspresso01

True, I know a low rated person that had gotten to elite when their account was like two or theee months okd

IeJoker

I assume you don't know what "vast majority" means

GavinTheKing668

I do

DepressoEspresso01

It means the (I’m bad at explaining) most of

IeJoker

So why are low rated players in legend league a problem?

DepressoEspresso01

I think he’s saying that they don’t deserve to be a legend, since they don’t really try hard, while higher rated try hard

IeJoker

That makes no sense lol...

IeJoker

Any rating is capable of spamming games... Your argument makes no sense

DepressoEspresso01

Idk, I’m not him

IeJoker

Why are you answering for him then?

GavinTheKing668

My argument is that the lower rated players just rely on the occasional win, not putting all their effort into winning games.

GavinTheKing668

The higher rated players try to make every game count.

GavinTheKing668

Not that some lower rated players don't try and win every game.