PROOF SCANDINAVIAN ISN'T A TERRIBLE OPENING AND IT'S ACTUALLY PRETTY OVERPOWERED

Sort:
Avatar of wk_18

So here's a 5|3 blitz game of me vs. a 2050, I played the Scandinavian. My opponent played passively and I got a good opposite-side castling position and a nice checkmate. All you haters who dislike the Scandinavian and say its a bad opening? You're right. But you can easily capitalize off of your opponent's mistakes and get some nice wins, which makes up for that. And if your opponent knows how to defend against this opening, you'll probably get a draw with best play anyways.

 

Avatar of wk_18

Also i'm not analyzing it because ComputeryMcComputerFace will say every move that I did is terrible, but you can go ahead and do it if you'd like.

Avatar of keep1teasy

I cannot fathom how white became a 2000 player like that

Avatar of wk_18

haters gonna hate

Avatar of wk_18

i mean, SCAMMMMMMMinavian is somewhat rare, so i can see why some people  haven't studied it extensively

Avatar of keep1teasy

I never said the Sandi was bad, I hate it because it's NOT bad

Avatar of wk_18

makes sense

Avatar of NobleElevator

lol scandi is op in bullet, nobody can argue about that.

Avatar of wk_18

exactly. the faster the time control, the better

Avatar of NobleElevator
WolfKid18 wrote:

exactly. the faster the time control, the better

ikr. I'm 8-1 AGAINST the scandi in classical otb though... sooooo lol

Avatar of wk_18

i havent played against the SCAMdi in any otb, but im pretty underrated and all my opponents play the giuoco piano

Avatar of NobleElevator
WolfKid18 wrote:

i havent played against the SCAMdi in any otb, but im pretty underrated and all my opponents play the giuoco piano

lol I'm like 1400 USCF, and I beat a few 1600s who played scandi -- scandi is great for online, but not too good for otb apparently...

Avatar of wk_18
WolfKid18 wrote:

So here's a 5|3 blitz game of me vs. a 2050, I played the Scandinavian. My opponent played passively and I got a good opposite-side castling position and a nice checkmate. All you haters who dislike the Scandinavian and say its a bad opening? You're right. But you can easily capitalize off of your opponent's mistakes and get some nice wins, which makes up for that. And if your opponent knows how to defend against this opening, you'll probably get a draw with best play anyways.

 

 

 

Avatar of NobleElevator

lol

Avatar of wk_18
Lemon365 wrote:

hmm, perhaps you dont realize how passive white played in the beginning? scandi is good against people who dont know how to play against it, like most gambits, (not saying scandi is a gambit). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py51XGnSnvs Gotta say, scandi kind of took an L here.

How to make a Scandinavian player feel bad about themselves and switch to Caro-Kann 101:

Avatar of NobleElevator
WolfKid18 wrote:
Lemon365 wrote:

hmm, perhaps you dont realize how passive white played in the beginning? scandi is good against people who dont know how to play against it, like most gambits, (not saying scandi is a gambit). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=py51XGnSnvs Gotta say, scandi kind of took an L here.

How to make a Scandinavian player feel bad about themselves and switch to Caro-Kann 101:

I play the caro a lot tongue.png

Avatar of congrandolor

You mean scandiBADian, I guess

Avatar of NobleElevator

lol

Avatar of blueemu

The Scandinavian isn't terrible. It's just an inferior version of the Caro-Kann. If White played passively against THAT opening, he would get a bad game, too.

Avatar of wk_18
AlbusDumbledore6 wrote:

scandi= trash

Sicilian=op

cri