Fraud
psycological question

The sentence below is true.
The sentence above is false.
If the sentence below is true, then the sentence above is false. But if the sentence above is false, then it is lying, therefore making the below sentence false. But that means that the below sentence is also lying, making the above sentence true. This means that the below sentence is true, but that can't be true because that would make itself false. This cycle basically goes on forever.
However, I later realized, I have first pondered over this astounding case, that these 2 sentences were not a paradox after all. What if both sentences were half true and half false? This means that the above sentence is half true, meaning the sentence below is half true, but the above sentence is also half false, making the below sentence half false. The same can be said about the below sentence.
This dilemma can teach all of us about life. Controversial arguments, or any argument really, are many times argued as if only one side is correct. Only one or the other is correct. However, our foolish viewpoint of black and white, good and bad, is not the right way to go. Many times, there can be an in between. Many people are naive that such a viewpoint can exist as a correct stance in an argument, and go on with their lives blindly without realizing this. However, those who DO realize this become wiser in realizing it, and can judge an argument or situation better. An idea might not be completely right or wrong. It might some positives and some negatives, and even some neutrals. People who don't realize this tend to not be open-minded, and they tend to be biased about the world around them. Hopefully, as the world grows with time, so will our understanding of the world.


Entails rather