One inaccurate statement on top of another and all because you know history very poorly.
>Stalin may not have been intenselky interested in chess, but his confidante, Krylenko, was.
Stalin had no personal relations with Krylenko, why do you call him "confidante"? He was butchered in 1938 like many other old bolsheviks.
>Jose Raul Capablanca also held diplomatic credentials from Cuba as an Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary. It would have been perfectly reasonable for Stalin to have met with him as a courtesy.
and thus such meeting would be registered and it was not.
>nor Lililenthal (a Hungarian living in USSR and soon-to-be Soviet citizen), nor Flohr (a Czechoslovakian Jew born in the Ukraine, and later a Soviet citizen)
None of then in 1936 could even imagine that they will become Soviet citizens.
>none of the Soviets in the tournament, dared to defeat Botvinnik.
Could defeat, you'd say. And it was not the case in 1935.
I remember watching this when it originally aired in 2004.
This may be where "OBIT" got the idea...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIAXIubSTkc