idk
Rating- age comparison for a 13- year old
Sort:
Apr 29, 2021
0
#3
I say you can get a title if you work at it hard. You picked it up a bit late to be spectacular. Look at modern super GMs and when and where they got their milestones. It will require traveling and dedication.
While you have a knack for the game, I have to say you’re no prodigy, and even the prodigies had to work hard to get to the top. Expertise is never going to be effortless.
While you have a knack for the game, I have to say you’re no prodigy, and even the prodigies had to work hard to get to the top. Expertise is never going to be effortless.
If you're 1900-2000 on Chess.com you're still pretty far away from becoming a GM, or even IM. Generally, Chess.com ratings are higher than FIDE ratings. For example, a lot of 2000-2300's I've seen on Chess.com have a FIDE rating of around 1800. The rating systems are different. FIDE uses the Elo system, while Chess.com uses the Glicko system, which generally rates higher.
Guys, could any of just tell me if I'm decent for my age, (in case u get one of these age- rating graphs online, post it in the thread too). I'm 13 and and about 1900- 2000 on these online chess sites and the thing is I only picked up playing chess on March 2019, when the lockdowns started, so I'm not too good in OTB and online is definitely my cup of tea, I just wanted to know you guys' jugdements, remarks or comments about my skill and if maybe, just maybe, I could become a world champ, atleast a titled player if I work hard, as I mentioned, I'm quite young and I would really like some help or learn my weaknesses (check my games), so if any of you guys could tell me something or the other, be sure to do so
.
Thanks in advance!